return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 month agoThe fossil fuel primary: Why Chevron and PG&E are spending millions to boost Becerrasfstandard.comexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up130arrow-down11
arrow-up129arrow-down1external-linkThe fossil fuel primary: Why Chevron and PG&E are spending millions to boost Becerrasfstandard.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square4fedilink
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 month agoReviewing tomorrow slate for California… JFC California this is the best you could do? Fucking crazy good candidates coming up ALL over the nation and this is what you’ve come up with?
minus-squarelolo@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 month agoC’mon, didn’t you hear? There’s a “progressive billionaire” in the race (that this publication seems to want elected). So we’re probably all good.
minus-squarevery_well_lost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoAt this point it’s basically impossible to interpret the Democrats’ overall strategy as anything other than intentional sabotage.
minus-squaredondelelcaro@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 month agoThere are better candidates on the ballot, but money and strategic voting because of FPTP make some of those candidates less likely to be elected. This isn’t an issue unique to California.
Reviewing tomorrow slate for California…
JFC California this is the best you could do? Fucking crazy good candidates coming up ALL over the nation and this is what you’ve come up with?
C’mon, didn’t you hear? There’s a “progressive billionaire” in the race (that this publication seems to want elected). So we’re probably all good.
At this point it’s basically impossible to interpret the Democrats’ overall strategy as anything other than intentional sabotage.
There are better candidates on the ballot, but money and strategic voting because of FPTP make some of those candidates less likely to be elected. This isn’t an issue unique to California.