• GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I have 64gb, and everyone was like why, you don’t need that much, it’s a waste etc.

      Three years down the road, I don’t regret it, let’s put it that way. Yeah it’s not really necessary, but I knew this would happen (not the ram price stuff - the sloppy coding and the gaming world’s ever expanding requirements).

  • joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Not really sure why there was outrage for this. 16GB has been seen as the minimum going back to COVID times? (If I recall correctly?) 32GB is a reasonable amount to recommend if they expect a user will also be running a browser and discord while gaming.

    The windows 11 team at Microsoft isn’t responsible for the realities of modern software. The community bulling them into pretending that 32GB isn’t a good recommendation these days doesn’t actually help anything

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I haven’t bothered to read the article yet, but I’m gonna go out on a limb and assume they want our PCs to be so overpowered in order to better run their AI bullshit. Gonna turn us into a distributed datacentre or something.

  • habitualTartare@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    For modern AAA games I’d say that’s pretty accurate of a recommendation despite the costs associated with ram. Ideally games should be optimized to run on 8Gb but windows and other software is probably going to happily eat up a few gigs.

  • oni ᓚᘏᗢ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    With Linux I can run all those apps that the article say plus whatever I’m playing and hardly enough I get close to 12 or 15 gb of ram.