• GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    The real estate market. In many countries, the value of labor and materials necessary to build a house is about 30 to 40 40 to 120 thousand euros. Everything else is speculation.

    Edit. Initially I put 30 to 40 thousand euros.

    • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Location matters though. It wouldn’t make sense for a house to cost as much as it does to make. Though obviously prices have become completely detached from reality.

    • freebee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      It’s not only speculation, it’s also because some locations are a lot more wanted by many people to live there: right next to a big park, walkable neighbourhood, city amenities nearby but few city problems, no highway audible when sleeping with open window et cetera et cetera. More people want to live in prime locations than prime location housing is available.

      The big scam are the insane prices for run down shoebox-apartments in shitty locations.

  • daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    21 days ago

    I moved to Chicago a few years. I go to rent an apartment. It has a “move-in” fee.

    I’m like what’s that.

    Oh it’s $500 that you don’t get back.

    I say. What about the deposit? They say. Oh yeah we don’t require that. Isn’t that great ,?

    I’m like. So move in fee is my deposit but it’s just guaranteed I won’t get it back.

    Them: well it’s different. It’s a move in fee. We don’t require a deposit but if you don’t clean out the apartment to this list of specifications, we will charge you per item you miss.

    Example. Refrigerator not cleaned :$150 Floors not clean : $200

    Etc.

    So I was super unhappy about this and complained to anyone who would listen. To which my new Chicago neighbors and friends were like “that’s how it’s always been here,”

    Bro. Y’all getting fucked. Hard. Non refundable deposit where you still have to clean out the old apartment.

    Wtf. Should be illegal.

    • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      21 days ago

      What the fuck? So it’s just a deposit you’re garuanteed to not get back? What if you don’t “miss” anything when cleaning up? You’re not getting your money back anyway so why clean anything when you’re moving out?

      • daannii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        21 days ago

        Yeah there was a whole list of things and the fine for not cleaning the items. So you had to make sure you got it super clean or you would get all the fines.

        Of which amounted to something close to $1000.

        I spent 2 days cleaning it when I moved out to make sure I didn’t get any of the fines.

        You can basically get black listed as a renter if you don’t clean well.

      • Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 days ago

        At least in Chicago, many landlords require references from past landlords when you are applying for a new apartment, so flaking on rent or trashing a place before moving out can doom your future endeavors.

        Unless you get lucky and find a private owner to rent from that doesn’t bother with checking backgrounds.

        Then you just have to deal with them taking ages to repair anything and letting themselves into your apartment unannounced to ‘check on things’.

        • hateisreality@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 days ago

          In my experience the private landlords are the ones who actually fix shit. Last corp landlord I had lost a civil suit for 20 million in Cambridge mass for not maintaining the property.

          • daannii@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 days ago

            I’ve had the opposite experience but I think it’s always a gamble with landlords. Especially when moving to a new city and you can’t ask around.

    • dom@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 days ago

      And recycling most plastics. End up in a landfill because its cheaper than actually recycling them.

    • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      This. I have opinions on waste management, please indulge a little rant, if you will?

      In my city they also now have us pay for the privilege of dumping residual waste. It’s worth noting that residual residential waste is stuffed into a silo - the users bring it to a collection point, and open it with an RFID key card. You’re sent a bill for each time this is opened.

      It’s also worth noting that the plastic bin, if it looks like they can’t sort it, they will toss it in general waste.

      These factors combine into a situation where:

      • Tossing things in the recycling bin has it end up in gen waste anyway
      • It’s cheaper for the end user to dump their residual waste inappropriately, either by stuffing it into recycling despite not going there, or by dumping it in the bushes somewhere

      Imo, fixes would include the following:

      • At the very least, using the general waste silo should not come with extra costs
      • Recyclables and residual waste should be merged into a single waste flow, which is to be recycled in general.
      • We should make work of actual plastic recycling at a commercial scale.
  • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    21 days ago

    Everything about cars from manufacturing, sales, insurance, repair, registration and taxes. We could just have Public transportation.

    • GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 days ago

      The car is a tool to move yourself and your family/friends from place A to place B. But James Bond, Batman, rap videos made a status symbol of it. They created a modern mythology around it.

      The transformation of the automobile from a means of transport into a luminous totem of status is a near-perfect case study of what Pierre Bourdieu theorised as the conversion and misrecognition of capital.

      Bourdieu argued that capital presents itself in three fundamental guises: economic capital (money, assets), cultural capital (knowledge, taste, credentials), and social capital (networks, group membership). These are not static silos; they are constantly converted into one another to legitimise and reproduce social hierarchies. The car, in its purest state, is merely objectified economic capital, a purchased good with a clear use-value: to move from A to B. But the moment it enters the cultural field, it is inscribed with meaning, and it becomes a vehicle for symbolic capital, which Bourdieu defined as the form the other capitals take when they are perceived and recognised as legitimate.

      https://archive.org/stream/bourdieu-the-forms-of-capital-1/Bourdieu The Forms of Capital-1_djvu.txt

  • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    21 days ago

    college textbooks. have to have the latest edition for class, but almost nothing is different from the two-years-old one.

    • 1D10@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 days ago

      I honestly don’t understand that, I have always rounded up for money going out and down for money coming in. So if I see something priced at $3.25 my brain thinks $4, and if I earn $3.25 my brain thinks $3 dollars.

  • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    20 days ago

    Passive income. If value is being created and you’re being presented some of it without doing any work it necessarily means that someone else isn’t receiving the full value of the work they’re doing.

    • Owen Earl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      In most cases I agree with you, but what about a musician who makes passive income off of people streaming their music, or people who buy my fonts?

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        20 days ago

        Cap it at the original 28 years after creation. The current 70 years after the creator’s death is ridiculous.

        • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 days ago

          Even 15 years is a lot of money for something you most likely spent under 6 months creating. Of course, we could always have a detailed system and not just one flat time frame.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 days ago

            I think people overestimate how much the average creator can get from their work over time. They need to keep creating to maintain a livable income. Also, 28 years is a good number because it prevents mega corporations from stealing from small creators. Imagine if some novel series becomes a big hit, but Disney or Warner Brothers could just adapt it whenever they pleased without paying the author.

      • amorangi@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        20 days ago

        Why should you be paid in perpetuity for work you did once? I’d love it if someone paid me residules for the work I did today making widgets.

        • spongebue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 days ago

          But how should a singer who produces an album, or an author who writes a book, or whatever be compensated? Its popularity isn’t really known until after it’s published, it’s not really fair for a damn good writer to get paid the same as someone who produces slop.

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    21 days ago

    College / university in many countries.

    In the US at least, its become such a parasitic industry, with tuition fees rising exponentially and far exceeding wage rates and job availability, that it accounts for a large portion of most people’s personal debt.

    With so many applicants for so few jobs, a college degree is the new highschool diploma / “minimum requirement” for nearly every job now. 1 / 4 US adults have student loan debt, with an average of 40k in student loans.. Nothing is putting the brakes on degree inflation, tuition, or the student loan industry.

    The US federal government also makes a killing off of student loan interest fees, most of which is going to the MIC and Israel.

    They’ve made the product they’re selling you (a degree), both required, and extremely expensive; the ultimate goal of any parasitic industry. Its a dream for state and private colleges, the US government and its military, and a nightmare for people either without a job, or chained to their desks for fear of losing their job and getting further behind on loan payments.

    • Clocks [She/They]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      I worked 64 hours a week to pay for my College Tuition.

      That is plus 18 hours of classes, and 18 hours of studies a week.

      This was for the cheapest college near me at a rate of $4000 a semester.

      I love being slaved to the point my grades were low only because of my work. When I saved enough / got scholarships, I was able to stop working, and my grades became a 4.

      So in summary, slaving to afford a chance to have a low grade compared to those with wealth who can get to focus all their time to college.