I mean, the article seems to do a pretty good job of answering the question in the headline. There isn’t strong evidence in the files (which have been released) that anyone else was involved in sex trafficking.
The lack of arrests in the U.S. contrasts to the fallout in the U.K., where investigators have pursued charges related to corruption, not sexual abuse, in their dealings with Epstein. Two former government officials — former Prince Andrew and ex-ambassador Peter Mandelson — were arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office.
First of all, I added “partial” to the headline and “in the US.” which I shouldn’t have had to have done. Their headline makes it sound like it’s a done deal and that all of the files were released.
Second, they don’t mention that victims are saying that they haven’t released all of the files.
I mean, the article seems to do a pretty good job of answering the question in the headline. There isn’t strong evidence in the files (which have been released) that anyone else was involved in sex trafficking.
First of all, I added “partial” to the headline and “in the US.” which I shouldn’t have had to have done. Their headline makes it sound like it’s a done deal and that all of the files were released.
Second, they don’t mention that victims are saying that they haven’t released all of the files.