• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    “Mistakenly”. They knew very well why they tried to hide them from public scrutiny. If they can’t find them, just look for files mentioning “Donald”, “Don”, or “Trump”. Those areare most likely the ones they withheld.

    • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The very real number of redactions of the word “don’t” with no other contextual redaction beyond that specific word is amazing. They were clearly looking to erase all mentions of Don T.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    21 hours ago

    None were mistakenly withheld. Only intentionally withheld.

    Which is weird, because they’re not going to pursue justice anyway. Why not just release the documents?

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yeah, what is with the “mistakenly” part? Are they implying someone in the DOJ just turned on OpenClaw and did some vibe redactioning?

  • Jerb322@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Why are they so willing to protect the pedo at their own demise? It’s got to come back to them at some point…right? Man, I really hope so.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I sure hope so. Starting with the very fucking top, I want them disbarred ( if they are lawyers ) and sent to prison for multiple years.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    LOL, as if they really have to sit there on meditate on that or something.

    “Gee, are we covering up for the pedo president?”

    I’m sure it’s a real puzzler.