Summary

President Biden recently authorized Ukraine to use longer-range U.S. missiles to strike inside Russia, marking a small but overdue escalation in the conflict.

This decision aims to disrupt Russia’s military operations and bolster Ukraine’s position, especially with the potential Trump administration favoring pro-Russian policies.

Russia’s retaliatory missile strike on Ukraine, though deadly, represents more of the same tactics.

Analysts argue Biden’s earlier caution was excessive, and calling Russia’s nuclear bluffs is strategically necessary to counter further extortion.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    57 minutes ago

    Well that’s a shit opinion not supported by foreign policy experts. And the US puppet government he’s running in Ukraine is largely made up of Nazis.

  • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Biden isn’t escalating the war, he is slow-walking the aid. Too much to die, too little to live, as the Ukrainians say. If you give Russia 9 months to pull critical assests out of range and only allow strikes deep into Russia after a whole nother nations enters the war on the side of Russia, you can’t frame that as escalatory, no matter how much Putin bitches and moans.

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Hmmm. My idea of the process is a little different. Embedded CIA reports to the DOD on daily to and fro of the war. What the Ukrainians needed yesterday isn’t necessarily what they will need tomorrow. Wars evolve. The DOD takes this information and projects future needs leading to a budget recommendation to Congress. Congress creates a budget bill and passes it. Johnson sitting on that bill, BTW, put Ukraine behind the 8 ball. Biden uses that allocation to buy weapons per the DOD recommendations. Rules placed on weapons use, such as not using US missiles on Russian ground, are meant to stop escalation into NATO entering into the conflict. In fact when that rule ochanged there was an escalation, but not involving NATO, yet.

  • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Triggering WWIII with other nuclear powers is the right thing to do?

    It gets easier by the day to manufacture consent

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        55 minutes ago

        You mean like the Zelenskyy regime, which is composed of Nazis, banned opposition parties & media, and refuses to hold elections? Is that not authoritarian?

        • NewDay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          45 minutes ago

          You do not hold elections during a war if your constitution says so. Many countries do it this way. Russia can hold as many elections as it wants because those are not real elections.

          • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            33 minutes ago

            So just never stop the war, and you can keep holding office with a constant influx of billions! Brilliant trick!