

And can you describe what you think is wrong with that article? Does it make you question whether those 60+ dead were unrelated to the Israeli attack??
If that’s the case then it’s just an issue of the Guardian being written for smarter people
And can you describe what you think is wrong with that article? Does it make you question whether those 60+ dead were unrelated to the Israeli attack??
If that’s the case then it’s just an issue of the Guardian being written for smarter people
You gave a link accusing them of quoting Israeli officials
You don’t seem to be able to back up your accusation that they have been avoiding to use the word ‘killed’. So why make it?
The Guardian is not misinforming their readers about what’s happening in Gaza.
The way you’re talking about this is telling me that you’re too far gone to look at these things objectively
Do you have any examples of the Guardian dancing around the word ‘killed’? The fact you have to resort to their reporting on unrelated issues seems to suggest that’s not really the case
Do you have anything to back this up? I’ve never felt The Guardian was using euphemisms
If you’re really interested, I can only keep recommending you read the article yourself. You’ll find it explicitly states that said missiles and shells were fired by helicopters and UAV’s.
But what do you need to have explained about it? How can this still be news to anyone?? Do you want to believe the Israeli airforce only shoots flowers and thank you notes?
It really only takes 5-10 minutes to read
during the day fighter jets dropped 530 tons of bombs on Gaza
The article states that the bombs were dropped over Gaza, not Israel. It also states that the airforce, in hindsight, feels they acted too careful out of fear for civilian casualties.
I’ve read some of the ‘reasoning’ from this OP in the past and I’m afraid the twist that “the Israelis just went and killed themselves” is mostly wishful thinking
The article claims the exact opposite, ie. that the mentioned amount of bombs was largely dropped on targets within Gaza.
The term ‘Gaza envelope’ does not appear once and looks like a fabrication
Incite his rabid supporters to attack the inauguration?
Well I hoped you could back up your claim that the Chinese are paying more for African resources “than all western corpos combined” but I guess you primarily want to type some ‘strong man’ language instead lol
Yeah I’m sure you’ve got the books lying in front of you right now and not just relying on some vague propaganda from the usual sources wink
Hah if you don’t know any Indians, you wouldn’t fucking believe how much of their family drama is based on dowry issues
Removed by mod
Cat doesn’t taste much different from rabbit though
With a jewish comedian at the top
I think they’ve given them far too little for that. Russians keep gaining territory which will eventually break the Ukrainian morale. If the line doesn’t move or moves back a bit that’s a whole other perspective.
You sound like a caricature account ran by the Mossad to discredit pro-Palestinian posters