• Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      23 days ago

      I mean, a small crack is detrimental to the whole. One today, maybe not another for a while, but a crack looks to be forming. Not a lot, but it’s something.

    • SippyCup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      Famous and notable coward Don Bacon grows a single atom of spine, to be surrendered upon his almost immediate retirement.

      Fuck him, this is the most he’s spoken out as a representative of one of a handful of districts where he’d benefit from a little bipartisanship. And he waits until the end of his career to do the most milquetoast act of defiance he wanders across.

      I’ve met him. He’s a nice guy, when he was in the air force at least he tipped pretty well. But he’s a coward. And that will be his legacy.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    The bill was introduced by Rep. Johnny Olszewski (D-MD) last December and would allow for a minimum of 20 House members and five senators to call for congressional review of a pardon, which would lead to a 60-day deadline for Congress to nullify that pardon with a two-thirds majority vote – similar to a veto override.

    Listen, I think it’s great that we’re breaking the taboo of pardons being somehow sacrosanct.

    But there’s exactly one person I can think of that would get 2/3rd of the Congress off their assess to block clemency against.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 days ago

    Anyway to reverse prior ones like the J6 terrorists?

    How many crimes have they committed since (besides the crime of attacking our government over being butthurt about losing).

  • Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    Giving Congress power to do stuff is a waste of fucking time. They have had the power to do many things and don’t. Even even is supposedly specifically THEIR power to wield they have let trump use it himself

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    It’s all symbolic. A constitutional amendment has zero probability of being ratified, and everyone in DC knows it.

  • Karitas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    The pardon power is sort of odd to begin with. It gives not just the executive branch, but a single executive the power to completely override the judicial branch. I do feel there should be a committee or set of guidelines in place, regardless of who holds office.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    I don’t dislike this but the very nature of being able to reject the pardon creates another partisan issue. Make it exclusive to Trumps pardons.

      • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Yes that’s fair. The bill asks for a 2/3 majority so if Congress can come together and block a pardon that’s fine.