Summary

The Washington Post editorial board announced support for nearly all of Donald Trump’s Cabinet nominees, except four: Pete Hegseth, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Tulsi Gabbard, and Russell Vought.

The board justified its decisions by prioritizing minimal disqualifying factors over strong qualifications.

Some nominees, including Pam Bondi and Chris Wright, were approved despite controversies, such as ties to Trump’s 2020 election denial and climate change skepticism.

Critics argue the endorsements reflect loyalty over merit, raising concerns about the nominees’ qualifications and the paper’s objectivity under Jeff Bezos’s ownership.

  • FolknForage@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Idk - I kinda think that if any of this shit mattered, what WaPo or other legacy media say, Trump wouldn’t have won.

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    4 days ago

    Propaganda machine owned by a billionaire supports an incoming fascist regime? Aw man, too bad this has never happened before and we have no history to learn from about this.

  • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Really cool they…

    prioritized minimal disqualifying factors over strong qualifications.

    So, there’s nothing great about them, and they are just above the bar on “disqualifying” as they see it.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Bezos, a rich white billionaire who owns WP, donated money to Trump, also a rich white billionaire.

    Now WP supports Trump. What a coincidence.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’ll admit they suckered me with a really good deal when Ann Telnaes left. But this is showing that she was 100% right. It’s time to cancel WaPo folks. It’s no better than the US Chamber of Commerce’s* press releases.

    Note - Not actually a government agency, they’re a business lobby that cosplays a government agency.

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Is it insane to protect yourself from potentially the most powerful dictator to exist? The fact I’m saying this about trump makes me so mad.

    Edit:

    To all you that made this possible and reside here in the states. I never understood you. I never liked you. I never wanted to be around you. I hope you’re miserable.

  • Bonesince1997@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I guess it’s what those braindead readers want.

    Someone who agrees with Trump’s election interference, of which a news story breaks that said he would have been convicted for his meddling, is seen as someone with strong qualifications for Attorney General?! Yeah fuck you.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not really they keep taking huge hits on their subscriber numbers. 10% dropped after the non-endorsement crap. I’m interested in finding numbers for Ann Telnaes’ departure and the bleeding of the newsroom. But there’s a reason they show ads on their page now.