Hopefully that’s not what he’s saying. I hope what he’s saying is that the neoliberal Democrats aren’t in opposition to the crazy actions the Republicans are taking, and so anything they’re doing to stop them is purely performative.
Still not quite sure I agree with this, but I’m pretty sure that’s what the OP was arguing.
I hope what he’s saying is that the neoliberal Democrats aren’t in opposition to the crazy actions the Republicans are taking, and so anything they’re doing to stop them is purely performative.
That is a correct assessment of what I said.
Still not quite sure I agree with this
At least in as far as the contents of the bill, its not for either of us to disagree or agree with. Its what was. Democrats submitted the bill as it is written here. Biden’s whitehouse was responsible for this bill.
We could argue if it was a good bill or a bad bill; its probably obvious that I would argue it was a disastrous bill on multiple levels. Firstly, its just a terrible bill; any moral person shouldn’t vote for a party which puts bills like this before congress. Second, the manner in which Biden utterly floundered in their ability to steward preferred legislation through congress showed them to be an utterly and incapable manager of the nation. It highlighted his utter incompetence at a critical moment; that he was completely cuckolded by an out of power convicted felon who had clearly attempted to over throw the democratically elected government of the United States on January 6th. It showed Biden had no ability to manage the government he was a part of. Perfectly valid to disagree with this.
What we can’t disagree on is the contents of the bill, or which party was responsible for submitting it to congress, or that it was Biden’s legislation. Those are matters of fact.
Hopefully that’s not what he’s saying. I hope what he’s saying is that the neoliberal Democrats aren’t in opposition to the crazy actions the Republicans are taking, and so anything they’re doing to stop them is purely performative.
Still not quite sure I agree with this, but I’m pretty sure that’s what the OP was arguing.
That is a correct assessment of what I said.
At least in as far as the contents of the bill, its not for either of us to disagree or agree with. Its what was. Democrats submitted the bill as it is written here. Biden’s whitehouse was responsible for this bill.
We could argue if it was a good bill or a bad bill; its probably obvious that I would argue it was a disastrous bill on multiple levels. Firstly, its just a terrible bill; any moral person shouldn’t vote for a party which puts bills like this before congress. Second, the manner in which Biden utterly floundered in their ability to steward preferred legislation through congress showed them to be an utterly and incapable manager of the nation. It highlighted his utter incompetence at a critical moment; that he was completely cuckolded by an out of power convicted felon who had clearly attempted to over throw the democratically elected government of the United States on January 6th. It showed Biden had no ability to manage the government he was a part of. Perfectly valid to disagree with this.
What we can’t disagree on is the contents of the bill, or which party was responsible for submitting it to congress, or that it was Biden’s legislation. Those are matters of fact.