sTaTeS rIgHts *
*does not apply to Democrats or people trying to protect human rights within a state if it conflicts with right wing authoritarians’ vision for how everyone else should live.
Republicans have always been hypocrites.
Good thing executive orders are not laws.
Not how this works.
And suddenly, State Republicans are fine with having the Federal government take away their rights.
The cons whine about things like gender fluidity, but they’ve always been quite morally fluid, let’s say…
Correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t this effectively toothless? Like executive orders only effect things directly under federal and more specifically executive purview meaning even a city government could pass a regulation on AI in their area and it’d have more legal weight than an executive order. Or are they abusing unrelated powers to declare that no one can regulate AI?
Like I’m pretty sure the supremacy clause doesn’t apply to executive orders.
More specifically, they’re just directives to federal employees. It’s the equivalent of your boss telling you how to do your job.
Telecommunication is controlled by the Federal government.
They can write a law or they might as well eat that paper after he signs it, because it’s jus like him:
w o r t h l e s s
Executive orders don’t apply to states. States are not federal employees
What about States rights?
You mean those things that Republicans always whine about when some law comes on place that is good for everyone?
Yeah those van go fuck themselves
In the trash, along with free speech absolutism and freedom of and from religion, concern about deficits, and so on…the cons have always lied about their so-called concerns and principles.
Someday Trump will publicly burn the constitution and there will be thunderous applause
Id imagine this may get thrown out in court
So are they saying AI is a national security threat? Or that living without AI is a national security threat, in which one would imagine AI should be provided free access by the federal government to every person, as it is a threat to not have access? As an executive order is designed to be used only for an issue of national security, which we must have been living in such a threat since the country was founded until now.
Let me get this straight. AI now has more rights than we do?
Since AI is being created within private tyrannies we call “corporations”, which also have more rights than we do, it’s only natural.
Well no, because this is an executive order.
Meaning it’s just like if you or I said “Delaware is not allowed to make new AI laws!”
No one gives a shit, because this isn’t a law
Remember all the movies that said we would bully them? They hadn’t factored in the “economy”.
This is almost certainly because this very thin economy, or at least the stock market, is only barely staying afloat on the back of the AI bubble. This move could create room for them to superficially extend the bubble as long as possible and maximize their profits.
State rights much?
“Let’s push something that destroys the ecology and economy! We’ll call it “AI”! People everywhere will be jobless and suffering except for us!”. The world, with usa as a superpower, is very badly broken. Maybe it’s time to drop off the usa at the old folks home.
So the US is at the stage where whatever this orange jerkoff farts out of his decrepit dementia-riddled mind - becomes law? And aligned states will listen to this pap, non-aligned states will Ignore? Cause ruling by EOs like isn’t a thing
Is it me or is the Cheetos purposely driving the US into a civil war? Like, I would immediately believe it of evidence shows up that trump was paid by Putin to kill the US, but the more and more o see him doing this shit, I really believe he’s purposely trying to wreck that shit hole country
