• Ferrous@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Shoutouts to the the fucking masked videographer.

      Some commenters in the thread you linked are claiming that the videographer was working for ICE for a promotional video.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Are the officers also duty-bound to get pepper-sprayed by the ICEstapo while they are kidnapping and disappearing naked children?

    Just wondering what policy it is that Taco is pushing the Mayor to enforce…

  • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The minute JB removes protections for federal agents from ICE, DHS, and the FBI, and declares them guilty of state level treason, and is willing to deputize people to go after them, I’ll be more than happy to assist

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      14 hours ago

      That’s a distinction without a difference, so what’s stopping you from going after them already?

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Organized leadership instead of lone-wolf vigilantism is not a difficult distinction to identify, dude come on.

        • Zachariah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          removes protections for federal agents

          The consequences before/after protections are removed are the same. No one is ever getting a free pass to hunt federal agents.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            That doesn’t contradict what they said at all. The absence of state-level protection is objectively a difference in consequences, too.

            Please just stop with the nonsense.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Failure to protect is the name of the game in law enforcement. Long standing precedent that they are not legally required to protect anyone under any circumstances, despite the motto “protect and serve”. Pretty sure that includes armed federal thugs.