Removed by mod

Removed by mod

You figured it out! I used the phrase most likely to annoy “blue no matter who” tribal members. “Blue maga” isn’t going to listen anyways. Might as well control their reaction.

I might get a bunch of stupid replies and one serious one and if I prompt you guys like so it makes it easier to tell at a glance when I check my inbox.

Let’s forget a neolib Democrat was president and let an insurrection, election rigging, a child raping conspiracy, and more slide into the background.

You can literally vote blue and shit gets worse and then you’re an asshole for not voting blue. Fucking maga shits of another color.

Basically all us do not shoot people we disagree with. 300,000,000 million citizens and a glut of weaponry, doesn’t he get what Charlie Kirk meant by this is the price we pay? You will never plug all the holes, and we massively increase the chance a gun slips through along with the killer, and this is what will happen for as long as our culture and laws stay the same.

Take all the people Charlie Kirk has debated. Consider the surface area. All the people who must have had guns. And yet essentially every single person didn’t kill him.

There were more people debating him peacefully that day than trying to assassinate him. He was having his ideas dismantled by simple logic, as always, and ignoring it, as always. He just happened to be shot that day. They act like life is a simulation that’s meant to bend the rules for them rather than subjecting them to the same roll of the die as everyone else.

Does the Pareto principal work for morals?

Like 80% you go with the flow, 20% “call me Neville because even if I’m the last normal person on earth I’ll never stop looking for the cure.”

Or all the shootings that are normalized and have people commenting things like “let’s not make this political.”

How many minorities have been shot for knocking on the wrong door or using a stranger’s driveway? By shooters amped up on what these political figures are saying?

Why wouldn’t people kill each other based on rhetoric like “Democrats are demonic and they’re trying to fuck your children and erase white people” or “there’s a huge child raping conspiracy involving tons of powerful people and now that I’ve said this you need to immediately forget about it you stupid fucking bitch”

Other people can argue about morality but I am obsessed with how things actually function. I’m obsessed with the “exploits” we allow.

ie murder is illegal. Telling others to commit murder is illegal. But it’s legal to use words and ideas to rig a Plinko game so that if someone was crazy enough to play, they’d drop their chip exactly where you wanted.

These deaths happened awhile ago, when people started upping the ante. Just takes awhile for the crop to grow.

Trump has policy websites that include transcripts of him talking… it’s funny to go from pure AI tone to Trump in the space of one line break.

He should send NFT Trump, the version of himself that’s fit and young and much less orange.

A violent armed robbery is like a negotiation.

You see, people are considering the situation and value is transferred between parties.

I’m so smart. I’m like, negotiating life right now.

It’s just absurd to consider that a volunteer would accept military life, military camps, hostile foreign countries, getting shot at by old men fighting for arbitrary ideals in a far away land… and they (pretend to?) agonize over morals…

This is just national guards but still. There’s a lot of people that are willing to kill people to protect our freedoms.

But there’s a conspicuous lack of soldiers fighting and dying for our freedoms when it’s clear as day. Whoops! There goes basically their only justification.

Yes. I would care. I’m a piece of shit conservative who lives and dies by optics. I’m trying to be president. The moment I’m seen as just a silly little couch fucker I will be ripped apart by the mob.

That’s why me and my fellow conservatives are so obviously unaffected. We think about how others will perceive us. We think about it and then we do a little dance so others know we’re above it all.

Even if I don’t care I can’t afford to let people think I do. Trump may be a successful child rapist but this is still a country full of people who will drop you for… seeming excited, or looking silly in a tank, or denying you are a crook.

(I imagined I was Vance. Normal people wouldn’t care. A maga vice president is not like your coworkers and neighbors though.)

I think every accusation is a confession is a serious heuristic so when Abbott says Democrats are receiving bribes my reaction is to wonder who is paying Republicans. Republicans openly admitted to taking bribes, in their own special way, and I know others are paying attention too.

Russia, if you’re listening…

MA 117 47

I don’t trust these kinds of bills because voters don’t know enough to have a say.

Politicians will announce policy MONTHS in advance. People don’t care because CNN or whatever didn’t make it consumable. And then politicians make moves on the stock market. And then people accuse them of insider trading.

The last few times Pelosi has went viral, the policies were hashed out ad nauseum and even made headlines well in advance. Way before she made her moves.

People have no idea what’s going on and then a bill like this appears?

Edit: the amount of people who take this further is rare. It’s all about “insider trading.” But what about the things they actually do to profit off governance?

Where’s the enhanced interrogators when you need them?

Replace Hamas with maga and he makes sense

I don’t care if it’s a hypocritical attack or a distraction from Epstein. It’s still bullshit to break ethics rules.

Also how do you have a staffer helping you with paying for things and you still mess up and accept a free ticket for your partner? A ticket to the place you are going to? What a dumb thing to do.

That’s at least two that have simply said, “I’m sweeping the Epstein files under the rug for Trump.”