deleted by creator

You could predict what a Republican will say just by shaking a magic-88 ball.

But aren’t these kids walking the walk? That must piss them off right?

The young conservatives want to burn everything down and see blood run through the streets. And then they get in trouble by the old guard. A bunch of hacks who don’t actually believe what they say.

I wonder how many young Republicans are considering liquidating the RINOs, considering the way they talk. If they think it’s funny to make each other kill themselves surely these young Republicans would think it’s funny to kill Republicans who are afraid to speak the “truth.”

Oh look, it’s America’s Most Wanted.

I honestly hope Nazis continue to fuck with military personnel. These are volunteers trained to shoot a rifle and they’re supposedly willing to kill or be killed to defend our freedoms.

For the love of god please open up multiple fronts in the war on America.

He has a heart just not a brain. He’s a lover, not a thinker!

“Trump is a fag” and it’s not even a meme community

Conservatives remind me of Predator. Specifically the part where it replays snippets of human speech in order to confuse its prey.

What’s the point of words like favorable opinion when it results in a 16 point split between a late show comedian and a Nazi conman?

I don’t know what opinion means, or what it means for people to state their answer, other than the superficial takeaway that they produced noises xyz when prompted with question 123. And? Is there any solid ground here to build on top of?

It’s crazy that there’s any other position.

Bernie fucking Sanders just sits there like a dumb bitch “calling Trump out.” All these people pursuing “more important matters” while a systemic child raping conspiracy is allowed to turn into a circus.

And this is who we have. A handful of nutters who are the only ones “crazy” enough to care. All the other career politicians can go Kirk themselves.

A tyrant threatened a private business and a person was fired from that pressure. Over their comments about politicians making things too political.

I don’t give a shit about Kimmel or Disney or some corporation’s bottom line. These things are not important. They are ancillary details to the context of a dictator shutting down free speech.

This stuff is more like celebrity gossip… It’s gossip related to a thing that matters.

You are not interpreting this correctly, and neither is TheHill / Independent / whatever.

Think about it step by step.

1. Some time ago, America was hardcore opposed to the USSR and the Communist bloc. Americans like her grew up hearing comparisons with Communist dictators and how they did X, Y, and Z. The bogeyman many people grew up with was a communist dictator who hated free speech, co-opted the state and therefore personally controlled industry, cracked down on artistic expression…
2. That’s what we’re dealing with now. Not from the perspective of a McCarthy Boogeyman; Kamala isn’t saying he’s a communist. But from the adult perspective where we’re supposed to care about free speech, a private industry, liberal art… Trump is the thing people grew up hearing about.

Tldr; Kamala didn’t say this. This never happened. Watch the interview and think about what she means. Journalism strikes again~

Edit: Here’s a simpler example: “We went years hearing from the right about demonic liberals abusing kids. Well Trump is that—that’s what we’re dealing with now.”

That isn’t saying Trump is a demonic liberal. It means “the thing everyone hated is here in a different form”

Basically all us do not shoot people we disagree with. 300,000,000 million citizens and a glut of weaponry, doesn’t he get what Charlie Kirk meant by this is the price we pay? You will never plug all the holes, and we massively increase the chance a gun slips through along with the killer, and this is what will happen for as long as our culture and laws stay the same.

Take all the people Charlie Kirk has debated. Consider the surface area. All the people who must have had guns. And yet essentially every single person didn’t kill him.

There were more people debating him peacefully that day than trying to assassinate him. He was having his ideas dismantled by simple logic, as always, and ignoring it, as always. He just happened to be shot that day. They act like life is a simulation that’s meant to bend the rules for them rather than subjecting them to the same roll of the die as everyone else.

Does the Pareto principal work for morals?

Like 80% you go with the flow, 20% “call me Neville because even if I’m the last normal person on earth I’ll never stop looking for the cure.”

Or all the shootings that are normalized and have people commenting things like “let’s not make this political.”

How many minorities have been shot for knocking on the wrong door or using a stranger’s driveway? By shooters amped up on what these political figures are saying?

Why wouldn’t people kill each other based on rhetoric like “Democrats are demonic and they’re trying to fuck your children and erase white people” or “there’s a huge child raping conspiracy involving tons of powerful people and now that I’ve said this you need to immediately forget about it you stupid fucking bitch”

Other people can argue about morality but I am obsessed with how things actually function. I’m obsessed with the “exploits” we allow.

ie murder is illegal. Telling others to commit murder is illegal. But it’s legal to use words and ideas to rig a Plinko game so that if someone was crazy enough to play, they’d drop their chip exactly where you wanted.

These deaths happened awhile ago, when people started upping the ante. Just takes awhile for the crop to grow.

Trump has policy websites that include transcripts of him talking… it’s funny to go from pure AI tone to Trump in the space of one line break.

He should send NFT Trump, the version of himself that’s fit and young and much less orange.

A violent armed robbery is like a negotiation.

You see, people are considering the situation and value is transferred between parties.

I’m so smart. I’m like, negotiating life right now.

It’s just absurd to consider that a volunteer would accept military life, military camps, hostile foreign countries, getting shot at by old men fighting for arbitrary ideals in a far away land… and they (pretend to?) agonize over morals…

This is just national guards but still. There’s a lot of people that are willing to kill people to protect our freedoms.

But there’s a conspicuous lack of soldiers fighting and dying for our freedoms when it’s clear as day. Whoops! There goes basically their only justification.