Do you know what the word “most” means? Do you also see that the article misrepresents her position which is basically “use an easier word than ologarch”?
Take a breath; if you did read the article, you apparently didn’t read my comment. It doesn’t say “if you disagree it’s obvious you didn’t read it”.
Read the fucking article before you comment. It’s obvious most did not.
If she died tomorrow, I would still drive 30 mins out of my way to pee on her grave in a week 🤷
Holy fuck she’s my age. I thought it would take longer for a cancer like MTG to metastasize.
If it gets you and anyone else off their lazy asses it’s a win. And if you “don’t get why”, thanks for your tax money because I’m the one getting breaks on your dime. Hopefully that pisses you off. If it doesn’t, well, my next house will have a pool and you’ll rent. Get mad and DO something!
Well you’ve succeeded at being mad about it. Next maybe instead of spending 7 seconds complaining you don’t understand, spend 11 seconds and know the answer.
If you were a right wing grandmother you would at least have watched enough TV to know something without complaining you had to watch the full segment between commercals. Instead you play the whiny and resentful twit. Sorry I didn’t make a fucking TIKTOK of this issue to fit your goldfish attention span. Channel that rage into voting, calling, and action instead of being a know nothing whiny waste of oxygen. It’s not the job of the world to spoon feed you facts and an opinion.
“I don’t understand”. WELL JESUS FUCKING NUGGET. PUT IN SOME EFFORT YA DINGUS!
Edit: In the time since this comment was made, I have called both my senators and emailed my congressional rep. What have you done?
Then Google it and catch up. Booker is kicking ass and you want a spoon-feed? Not from me.
You made my point:
It behooves the reader to ignore things you find unintelligent
And the rest of it makes no sense anyway because I don’t think you can define “behoove”.
No no no.
I didn’t read your comment or your argument. I won’t because I don’t give a shit for one, and for two if you don’t give a shit enough to proofread it it’s obviously not worth the time.
You can descriptive grammar yourself right to the downvotes and don’t give a shit pile. Sorry bout ya. It’s “dumbesk”.
Oh my god, imagine being you, thinking you’ve got it all figured out and smugly laying it out in the most laughable way against maybe the most lefty, grassroots senator in Congress. It reads as so mind numbingly dumb. It’s exhausting just to read it.
You “ain’t got no” reasonable perspective here my friend. I don’t know what I would expect from someone who typos their own username though. Whatever that expectation should be, you came up short.
Edit: Americans are awake, and feel attacked XD.
You should, or the point you make is we shouldn’t listen to your point because you are barely literate 🤷?
Any machine you can write a lemmy comment on can also spell check. Not checking means you don’t give a shit about what you write, so why should anyone else?
Since basically forever in this context. Congrats on collecting a new word.
I pay my $25 a year
Yeah… Most people don’t. Some do.
Devil’s advocate: do the last 3 deserve it? Are they unsafe to other inmates and also not possible candidates for rehabilitation and release to society?
If yes… Welp.
I hope he broke out his fucking teeth
Another asshole looking for an adjustment
Yes they mean something different. If you go ask 5 random people what an oligarch is, at least one is likely not to know what it means.
The “woke” reputation stuff is also a little weird, but there again, the people using it as an insult probably don’t have a good working definition.
It’s easy to say “words have meaning” but lots of people, even left leaning ones, don’t always know what those meanings are.