Rest in piss
Rest in piss


When you stand for nothing popular, you need to distract people with a culture war. It’s all by design, they are utilizing rage bait to keep us from realizing they are actively fucking us.


The truth has a left wing bias.


The government sucking / being inefficient is right wing propaganda.


Just fucking do it.


No he wants to do this regardless of being on the list. This was in project 2025.


She voted for it, what did she expected. If you didn’t want it to pass you can just not vote for it


I would argue that they aren’t more conservative, they are in a bad place and looking for someone with answers. The Democrats have essentially preached status quo for the last decade. Many working class voters look at where they are and look at the party looking to keep things the same, and they either vote for the other party or don’t vote at all.
If someone was to offer non-fascist solutions to the problems most of the working class are having, I suspect we would be talking about how the working class has swung left.
I am not saying conservatives are the right choice for the working class by any means, but the perception by many is that they are looking to break the status quo in a world where most people feel like they are worse off than they could be.


No it’s complying to fascist.


Oh she stands for something. It’s very explicit. She is telling you she would rather a sexual assaulter than a brown, Muslim man.
She is a racist.


Liberals are against every war except the current one.


There aren’t enough of them to enforce this. Keep obstructing them.


I love when people get mad that Tom Morello is suddenly political and say they like rage against the machine better before it was political.
Motherfucker, have you listened to a single lyric?


Funny what happens when you actually do something.


Chuck is an absolute fucking loser


Chuck is an absolute fucking loser.
Or trump just sides with the money. It’s not always a conspiracy and it’s a disservice to believe there is.


Joe Biden over here complying in advance.
The one change at a time works only when there isn’t so much overhead it grinds the system to a haul. The government isn’t software, and software development has less overhead than running a whole country. At this level of overhead, one change at a time would mean we would get sufficiently less passes. Software development is also about efficiency and understanding when to make trade offs. You have to trade off the one change at a time paradigm so you can accomplish your job.