return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days agoBiden says he's partially responsible for Trump beating Democrats in 2024www.cbsnews.comvideomessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up151arrow-down17
arrow-up144arrow-down1videoBiden says he's partially responsible for Trump beating Democrats in 2024www.cbsnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·edit-22 days agoWell, just to name a few: sack Garland after it became apparent that he was not fit for purpose. Better yet, he shouldn’t have even picked him sack DeJoy (do not give me that bullshit about how “his hands were tied” - that’s demonstrably a matter of interpretation) GOP wants to lean into the maximalist interpretation of executive power? Maliciously comply. pack the court I can go on, at length, but I’m sure you’re starting to get the point.
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 days ago sack Garland after it became apparent that he was not fit for purpose. Better yet, he shouldn’t have even picked him Garland did the job he was hired to do. He slow walked the investigation so biden could run against trump again.
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days ago Better yet, he shouldn’t have even picked him. Did you skip that part?
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoNo. He shouldn’t have been picked. I just said what the bad reason for picking him was.
Well, just to name a few:
I can go on, at length, but I’m sure you’re starting to get the point.
Garland did the job he was hired to do. He slow walked the investigation so biden could run against trump again.
Did you skip that part?
No. He shouldn’t have been picked. I just said what the bad reason for picking him was.