A federal judge found probable cause that the Trump administration acted with contempt of court in violating his order to immediately halt deportations of Venezuelans suspected of being gang members.

US District Judge James Boasberg issued an order Wednesday saying that officials acted in “willful disregard” of his verbal order on March 15 to turn around planes carrying Venezuelans now held in a notorious prison in El Salvador. Boasberg said at a court hearing on April 3 that “the government acted in bad faith throughout that day.”

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The Trump admin has been acting in bad faith and with wilful disregard towards justice in America for 86 days and counting.

    Can we marshal Marshal Marshall yet, Marshall?

  • besselj@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s it. that’s the article. I wanna see consequences for the facists, not the court confirming what we already know.

    • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      I agree, but it’s all about process. The only thing that ensures our rights are respected is the process that’s used every step of the way. Issuing this order was a critical step in the process. Without the contempt order as a foundation, there could be no consequences for the administration ignoring the order. I completely share your frustration, but these things matter as they build up to what should inevitably be real consequences for the fascists. The judge knows we’re all watching, so he’s gotta be sure to get it right.

      That said, I’m not confident there will actually be any meaningful consequences, but there definitely wouldn’t be any without this order.

  • MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    What’s the punishment for this kind of contempt? $1000 fine?

    Like, okay contempt, soooo? Can’t they just contempt the contempt?

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Depends on the type of contempt charge. Legal Eagle compares the types in a video on this case.

      tl;dw

      • Civil Contempt (coercive) - incremental fines or jail time until the charged follows an order.
      • Civil Contempt (compensatory) - a fine paid to someone who was wronged by ignoring a court order
      • Criminal Contempt (direct) - jail time meant as punishment for directly disobeying a judge while court is in session
      • Criminal Contempt (indirect) - jail time meant as punishment for disobeying a judge while court isn’t in session.

      Criminal contempt can be pardoned and Trump has pardoned it before. Civil contempt cannot be pardoned but it only lasts until an order is followed.

      Enforcing a contempt ruling is the next issue. Normally a US marshal would enforce it but they technically answer to the Attorney General, who answers to Trump, who could order them not to listen to the judge or be fired. A court could theoretically deputize someone to enforce the order directly, but that has never happened and people could just not recognize the authority of the deputized officer.

  • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    More talk. Yak, yak, yak. What a bunch of blather.

    Wake me when someone actually DOES something other than NOISE.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    FINALLY! They DEFINITELY Will Comply NOW! They do NOT want ANOTHER Stern Letter!