alessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish · 2 months agoNintendo applying for anti-Palworld patents in the US with a whopping 22 out of 23 rejected, but "they are fighting"www.windowscentral.comexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up1156arrow-down12
arrow-up1154arrow-down1external-linkNintendo applying for anti-Palworld patents in the US with a whopping 22 out of 23 rejected, but "they are fighting"www.windowscentral.comalessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square4fedilink
minus-squareaeronmelon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up45·2 months agoIt should be illegal to apply for patents with the express purpose of suing someone else over what is now prior art.
minus-squareZorque@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·2 months agoYes, but how does that make rich people more money?
minus-squareNutWrench@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoThis. You don’t “negotiate” with the Patent Office. The courts decide whether patent infringement has occurred. You “negotiate” with THEM.
It should be illegal to apply for patents with the express purpose of suing someone else over what is now prior art.
Yes, but how does that make rich people more money?
This. You don’t “negotiate” with the Patent Office. The courts decide whether patent infringement has occurred. You “negotiate” with THEM.