This kind of thing makes no sense. If they want to change your vote (which assuredly Stephen Miller does) they will just do it in data, there’s no reason to do it in the UI so people see it personally.
it was so infuriating watch Gore be all high-minded and noble while conceding way too fucking early when he should have been a pitbull trying to uphold peoples sacred right to vote. Dude was like “well fox news said I lost so might as well just give up.” 🙄 🤡 🤬
This kind of thing makes no sense. If they want to change your vote (which assuredly Stephen Miller does) they will just do it in data, there’s no reason to do it in the UI so people see it personally.
Why not maximize their chances by doing it at every possible step? Much less likely to be used as proof if the initial input matches the output. Just look at the 2000 election where Gore got -16,022 votes in a Volusia county precinct with only 585 registered voters. They tried to dispose of the proof but savvy reporters found the tabulations and pieced them together, and… Nothing came of it, so yeah I guess they can do whatever the fuck they want.
it was so infuriating watch Gore be all high-minded and noble while conceding way too fucking early when he should have been a pitbull trying to uphold peoples sacred right to vote. Dude was like “well fox news said I lost so might as well just give up.” 🙄 🤡 🤬
Exactly what they did in Ohio 2004. They targeted remote servers used to tabulate the various districts:
https://youtu.be/REn1BnJE3do?is=h7C1g-7vmSOSZ9h6