inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish · 21 days agoThe people have spoken: Motion blur is the worstwww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1292arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1289arrow-down1external-linkThe people have spoken: Motion blur is the worstwww.pcgamer.cominclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish · 21 days agomessage-square65fedilinkfile-text
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up35arrow-down2·edit-221 days agoIt’s also completely unnecessary. Motion blur is already a product of your brain not being able to keep up with your eyes and you’ll get a more natural motion blur without adding fake motion blur when the motion is fast enough.
minus-squareWolfLink@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·21 days agoWhen done properly, it plays a similar role to antialiasing, which is also an artificially added blur to cover up rendering artifacts.
minus-squareBlackLaZoR@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·20 days agoDepends on what type of AA we’re talking. Old style geometry based tech is actually increased resolution at the edges. New temporal tech tho…
It’s also completely unnecessary. Motion blur is already a product of your brain not being able to keep up with your eyes and you’ll get a more natural motion blur without adding fake motion blur when the motion is fast enough.
When done properly, it plays a similar role to antialiasing, which is also an artificially added blur to cover up rendering artifacts.
Depends on what type of AA we’re talking. Old style geometry based tech is actually increased resolution at the edges. New temporal tech tho…