He has ordered Attorney General Todd Blanche and the Justice Department until September 24 to provide the disputed records related to convicted sex offender Epstein, or explain why his orders were not “clear and unambiguous.”

“Defendant cites no authority for the proposition that administrative inconvenience excuses him from meeting his statutory obligation,” Sullivan wrote in his opinion. “Nor does he cite any authority for his apparent contention that Congressional silence in response to the January 30, 2026 letter functions as an implied amendment to the EFTA.”

Sullivan wrote that a civil contempt finding against Blanche at this stage “would be premature” as such an order requires the defendant to have violated a “clear and unambiguous” order. Therefore, he gave the attorney general until September 21 to seek clarification with the court if any of the order was unclear.

  • Asafum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    “If you don’t do it this time, or create another excuse, you better be careful or I’ll wag my finger at you again! You wouldn’t like that now would you? You better do what we ask or we’ll be compelled to do nothing!”

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 days ago

      I don’t know what it entails if he is found in contempt by the judge, but this is just one step before that.

      a civil contempt finding