“Yesterday, you enabled your client, Congressman Max Miller, to share and disseminate to the public an electronic Dropbox folder of materials,” Chandra wrote, as reported by New York Times congressional correspondent Annie Karni. “This was in conjunction with a video rant about our client, Emily Moreno, that Miller posted on X.”

The first version of the folder contained private images of Miller and Moreno’s daughter, with the child’s name left unredacted, the letter says.

To counter his ex-wife’s statements, this Republican made sensitive pictures of him and his young daughter accessible to the Internet. He also ranted about everything on Twitter.

“At least one of those images could be considered Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) because the daughter’s genitals appear to be visible,” the filing says.

There appear to have been many views on the post:

The post garnered over 204,000 views before images were removed from a second version of the folder, the letter says.

And then the attorney continues…

The filing asks whether the images were removed because someone “realized that it was ill-advised (and, in the case of the potential CSAM image, illegal) to share these images with the world.”

“How many people accessed and downloaded the intimate image, and each of the other images of the child, including one in which her chest is exposed?” the letter demands.

I can’t imagine how the abuser will respond - or how he ever thought that any of this was sound in the first place.

Not that his father-in-law, another Ohio Republican, isn’t a total piece of shit himself. But you already likely heard.