• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The dream is deskilling, not necessarily making workers faster or more efficient. Instead of relying on highly skilled employees who have tons of leverage because of their experience and education, they’d be able to just put anyone on the keyboard to review and troubleshoot the chatbot’s outputs. They essentially want coding to require as much skill as any other assembly line work.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 minutes ago

      I mean they want that, but it’s just not happening with the way the tech works right now. Unless you have a deep understanding of the problem you have the model solve, then you have no way to evaluate whether it solved it correctly or not. And it’s basically like an evil genie where it will interpret your request in a dumbest way possible by default. So, you get god results when you already know what the shape of the solution should be, and you give the model concrete direction on the approach to take, algorithms to use, and so on. And that’s why the whole idea of deskilling workers or replacing them with automation is not really working out. You’d need genuine artificial intelligence for that and LLMs aren’t it.

    • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      that’s still not possible though, you need to know what to ask, you need to have some idea of how programmes work, etc.