Paranoid Factoid@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 21 hours agoPete Hegseth Is Trying to Resegregate the Militarywww.theatlantic.comexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1261arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1259arrow-down1external-linkPete Hegseth Is Trying to Resegregate the Militarywww.theatlantic.comParanoid Factoid@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 21 hours agomessage-square22fedilinkfile-text
Archive of article text: https://archive.is/2026.04.12-202208/https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/04/pete-hegseth-military-diversity/686734/
minus-squareSerinus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down3·13 hours agohttps://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/wikipedia-bans-archive-today-after-site-executed-ddos-and-altered-web-captures/
minus-squarebreakfastmtn@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up11·13 hours agoThat doesn’t mention any Russian narrative. They altered a page as part of their personal grudge with that blogger. The same blog targeted in the DDoS attack.
minus-squareHugeNerd@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·7 hours agoOh let him have his fun. Some people see 15 Russians behind every tree and the slightest breeze is caused by the KGB. They’re garden-variety Flat Earthers and Moon landing denialists, and are every bit as entertaining.
minus-squareParanoid Factoid@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·12 hours agoNot good just the same. Hacking readers’ computers via a capta exploit is some next level nefarious shit above and beyond changing archived text. Both violate users’ trust though. I had no idea about this.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·11 hours agoOK, but I’d still like a source for the actual thing claimed about pushing Russian narrative.
minus-squarebreakfastmtn@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·12 hours agoNot good, for sure. Sucks that there’s no working alternative. It’s trivial to not participate in the DDoS at least. uBO blocks it by default.
minus-squarechaogomu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 hours agoArchive.org the original and best.
minus-squarebreakfastmtn@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 hours agoDoesn’t do what archive.today does, unfortunately. This article wouldn’t be available in wayback.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/wikipedia-bans-archive-today-after-site-executed-ddos-and-altered-web-captures/
That doesn’t mention any Russian narrative. They altered a page as part of their personal grudge with that blogger. The same blog targeted in the DDoS attack.
Oh let him have his fun. Some people see 15 Russians behind every tree and the slightest breeze is caused by the KGB.
They’re garden-variety Flat Earthers and Moon landing denialists, and are every bit as entertaining.
Not good just the same. Hacking readers’ computers via a capta exploit is some next level nefarious shit above and beyond changing archived text.
Both violate users’ trust though. I had no idea about this.
OK, but I’d still like a source for the actual thing claimed about pushing Russian narrative.
deleted by creator
Not good, for sure. Sucks that there’s no working alternative. It’s trivial to not participate in the DDoS at least. uBO blocks it by default.
Archive.org the original and best.
Doesn’t do what archive.today does, unfortunately. This article wouldn’t be available in wayback.