• RedWeasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Interestingly I won’t be surprised when this specific ruling is used to protect trans rights. A double edge sword if you will.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Interestingly I won’t be surprised when this specific ruling is used to protect trans rights

      What?

      How is medical professionals being able to tell patients false and misleading information going to be used to support trans rights?

      • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        They also can’t be forced to lie or provide false and misleading information as well. The ruling even mentions the American Psychiatric Association calling homosexuality a mental disorder as a case where the AMA was wrong. It could end up being very interesting in how lower courts interpret this in the future in cases blocking trans care bans.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          It’s just about words…

          Not actually treatements

          But that’s not even getting into how crazy expecting logical consistency or fair enforcement is…