• melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I just know one of those DOGE sneaky little fuckers has the digital files on one of their hard drives while they were there stealing data hand over fist under the guise of saving a few bucks.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The guards who were supposed to check on him that night were online shopping after receiving large bank deposits days earlier…

    If Biden had just investigated this shit when president it likely would have stopped trump. And he might have even been in jail before the last election.

    There’s just so many different single things he could have done to prevent this, but that geriatric fuck we all held our noses for seemed to intentionally make the least popular decision with Dem voters at every opportunity.

    We can’t afford to settle for someone like him again, we need someone that will actually fight like we need to.

    • automata@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Your conclusions about Biden are speculative and poorly supported. There is some validity to the unconfirmed and supposed bribes.

      I stand behind your fight. Lead us, since you know the way. /s

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Your conclusions about Biden are speculative and poorly supported

        Man, almost like you read them on social media and not a scientific journal…

        • automata@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Indeed, right? It does not mean I should not speak up for false conclusions. And what are you adding worth anything to this discussion?

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            You still dont understand any of this…

            You could have asked questions, and then I could have explained things and even provided sources.

            Instead of doing that, you want everyone to pre-emptively source everything like a scientific journal would do.

            Like, do you this everywhere?

            If someone told you today was Saturday, would start screeching “calendar! Calendar! Calendar!”

            At them until they pulled out a calendar?

            Why should everyone predict what you would require a source for, instead of you just asking for one when you wanted one like literally every single human before you has managed?

            Why are you the special one everyone else has to accommodate?

            • automata@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              57 minutes ago

              What’s the point of just speaking what’s on your mind when there is no or little validity to it? Oh, wait, I guess you just want to be fucking heard and validated on some random shower thoughts with no push back from reality. I’m sorry, I’m making you think.

            • automata@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Look man, I did not ask for a source. I actually read what you had to say. I did my research to validate my thoughts and concluded what I posted, period.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Look man, I did not ask for a source.

                Obviously…

                I’m saying that’s how a rational person would have handled this…

                Something like:

                Hey man, im not aware of any of that and couldn’t find anything on a search. Could you elaborate or point me in the right direction?

                Super basic stuff.

                • automata@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  58 minutes ago

                  And I did do my due diligence and I fact checked his post and I came to my own conclusions. I had no need to have a discussion with somebody who was obviously erroneous in their assertions. If people want to talk, sure, I can do that. But once somebody attacks me, all bets are off, and that is what happened. OPs reaction to my disagreement was an ad hominum, not the beginning of a constructive discussion or valid critiques on my thinking.

                • automata@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 hour ago

                  I’m not one of those people, you may be. I simply stated that I did not agree with some things. If a discussion was to be had the original poster could have refuted my claims and then said discussion could begin. Instead, he was upset by my comment and chose to belittle me. And I don’t take that shit.

      • automata@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m here all day. Anybody got an actual point that they want to bring up and discuss? Let’s do this. Or you all just talking out your ass and downvoting because you have no fucking validity to your fucking existence.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Honestly, it would have made a whole lot of sense for him to just kill himself. He had to have known what was in store, he wasn’t stupid. If he hadn’t been on suicide watch, and if the rest of the coverup wasn’t so ineptly transparent, the reasonable conclusion would be that yeah he 100% did himself in. Save everyone else the trouble and himself some potential discomfort, etc. But like… nah. This has been so stupidly poorly hidden.

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          But even him killing himself shouldn’t have been possible. The conspiracy isn’t murder. It’s enabling his opportunity to kill himself.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Maybe, yep! Or someone did go in and kill him, since it shouldn’t have been possible, and then they released footage with missing time, and so on. He might have been enabled to do it or he might have been outright killed or whatever other option, but I don’t know that the precise distinction even matters anymore given how obviously guilty someone is.

            • danc4498@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Right. Either way, there is a conspiracy. I think there is evidence that he did kill himself, but that isn’t evidence that there isn’t a conspiracy.

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    What documents, I wonder? It’s not like there’s going to be forms documenting “hey we killed this guy” that need to be shredded, we already have suspicious visitor logs and the medical records and so forth, like… what would they have wanted to shred? And why shred it there, instead of just taking it as part of the investigation and disappearing it like they did with so many other documents?