The US president—who blew up a landmark diplomatic agreement with Iran during his first term—added that if a new deal with the Iranian government doesn’t materialize, “it will be a very bad day for that Country and, very sadly, its people, because they are great and wonderful, and something like this should never have happened to them.”

Trump’s acknowledgment that a US military assault would likely be devastating for ordinary Iranians runs counter to the narrative pushed by supporters of war, who claim conflict and regime change is necessary to aid Iran’s population.

  • Assian_Candor [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The New York Times reported over the weekend that Trump is considering an “initial targeted US attack” on Iran followed by “a much bigger attack in the coming months” if the nation’s government doesn’t capitulate to Washington’s demands, principally that Iran abandon its nuclear program.

    Hold on I thought the last strikes eliminated their enrichment capability 🤔

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      the fallout from the damage are either limited or passed onto the poorer 90% of humanity; no one in the epstein illuminati nor any other ruling class will have to suffer the consequences of any distraction.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I refuse to believe Trump “weighs” anything, despite the media’s constant sanewashing.