• FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    It doesn’t even specify illegal immigrants. They’re trying to strip all immigrants of rights, even if they’ve done nothing illegal. That’s genocide. And they want to get rid of birthright citizenship too, so even if you were born in the Untied States, you can still be branded an immigrant. Then what will the criteria be for distinguishing immigrants from citizens? Everyone is a descendent of an immigrant, except Native Americans. If you go back enough generations, even they probably came from Asia.

  • Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    No person shall . . . be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.

    -5th Amendment

    It doesn’t say no citizen. It says no person. So, if Due Process doesn’t apply to them, are they no longer people? Isn’t this basically one of the steps that led into the holocaust? They stripped the Jews of their citizenship, deprived them of personhood, then exterminated them.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Amendment XIV
      Section 1. [emphasis added]

      All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

      it seems if they had to state it twice it was both a problem and important. fuck that it’s a problem again. Also to echo your sentiment, person not citizen.

      • Sunflier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        That clause is basically what incorporates the bill of rights to apply against the states. Before that Amendment, the BoR just applied against the federal government. To this day there hasn’t been official recognition by the judiciary to apply the some of the BoR against the states (3rd Amendment, the dollar requirement from the 7th, and the like).

  • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    16 hours ago

    If due process rights don’t exist for immigrants, then they don’t exist for anyone. How can you show you’re not an immigrant without due process?

    • daannii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      First they came for the Communists

      And I did not speak out

      Because I was not a Communist

      Then they came for the Socialists

      And I did not speak out

      Because I was not a Socialist

      Then they came for the trade unionists

      And I did not speak out

      Because I was not a trade unionist

      Then they came for the Jews

      And I did not speak out

      Because I was not a Jew

      Then they came for me

      And there was no one left

      To speak out for me

      -Martin Niemoller