I haven’t the slightest hope I will change anyone’s opinion.
Good, because you’re not!
I am here because you felt the desire to post your opinion online, and I felt like I wanted to post my opinion about that, and now, here we are, with you claiming you don’t have to defend your post, but still giving me things to post my opinion about.
And you are totally free to do that. And I’m still not going to change my opinion, as you know. Thanks! :)
And I am still gonna demand proof of the claims of people in power. Zuck talking to some news outlet is not the same as me, at a house party, talking shit. Things he says, especially about the very important thing he has disproportionate influence over, has consequence.
I don’t need proof, because I believe him. And I have a feeling, even if he did provide proof, you’d be quick to say stuff like, “Well of course that’s easy to fake…” :)
No, if he had a record of the call/meeting. If there is an uninvested third party witness, etc. then I will take the claims seriously. Like I said, I do not doubt that the Biden admin, or any other presidential administration, has exercised undue influence over the media. It is indisputable that there is a history of it. However, I still want evidence before I go any further than “given the history, it could be true”.
I do not operate on faith, and you should not either, even though you will continue to do so. You also should probably drop the shit tier rags you post all the time, like the daily mail. If something is out there, a better outlet will have it.
Good, because you’re not!
And you are totally free to do that. And I’m still not going to change my opinion, as you know. Thanks! :)
And I am still gonna demand proof of the claims of people in power. Zuck talking to some news outlet is not the same as me, at a house party, talking shit. Things he says, especially about the very important thing he has disproportionate influence over, has consequence.
Cool.
And the news will keep uncovering all the bullshit the Biden admin did, and I’m here for it. Thank you! :)
Hopefully they will, however this is not that. Until proof is provided this is just puff to gain engagement via outrage.
This is that. And it’s delicious.
We know he is saying things you believe, and so you like it, and agree with it. Without proof though, it isn’t uncovering anything, just rage bait.
I don’t need proof, because I believe him. And I have a feeling, even if he did provide proof, you’d be quick to say stuff like, “Well of course that’s easy to fake…” :)
No, if he had a record of the call/meeting. If there is an uninvested third party witness, etc. then I will take the claims seriously. Like I said, I do not doubt that the Biden admin, or any other presidential administration, has exercised undue influence over the media. It is indisputable that there is a history of it. However, I still want evidence before I go any further than “given the history, it could be true”.
I do not operate on faith, and you should not either, even though you will continue to do so. You also should probably drop the shit tier rags you post all the time, like the daily mail. If something is out there, a better outlet will have it.
I like the Daily Mail. Thanks! :)