• Universal Monk@sh.itjust.worksOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Cool.

    And the news will keep uncovering all the bullshit the Biden admin did, and I’m here for it. Thank you! :)

        • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          We know he is saying things you believe, and so you like it, and agree with it. Without proof though, it isn’t uncovering anything, just rage bait.

          • Universal Monk@sh.itjust.worksOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Without proof though

            I don’t need proof, because I believe him. And I have a feeling, even if he did provide proof, you’d be quick to say stuff like, “Well of course that’s easy to fake…” :)

            • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              No, if he had a record of the call/meeting. If there is an uninvested third party witness, etc. then I will take the claims seriously. Like I said, I do not doubt that the Biden admin, or any other presidential administration, has exercised undue influence over the media. It is indisputable that there is a history of it. However, I still want evidence before I go any further than “given the history, it could be true”.

              I do not operate on faith, and you should not either, even though you will continue to do so. You also should probably drop the shit tier rags you post all the time, like the daily mail. If something is out there, a better outlet will have it.