• Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Having a hundred or more people on the Supreme Court would actually make a lot of sense. Why do we concentrate power so much when we know it results in corruption?

    Furthermore, Congress should have around 12,000 members.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      12,000 members is hyperbole, but Congress should be bigger. They used to increase the size of Congress with every census and reapportionment. But about 100 years ago, they couldn’t agree on how to do it, so they just didn’t. And it has stayed at 435 ever since.

      From https://thirty-thousand.org/house-size-why-435/

      By keeping the size of Congress fixed, the average population in each district gets higher and higher. But small states still get at least 1 representative! This increases the power of small states (who already get 2 Senators) even further.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        30,000 people per Representative. Do you think the wealthy could really control a congress that had this much representation. Perhaps, but it would be a hell of a lot harder. The concentration of power is one of our biggest problems.