• Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    If it was, Kirk would be in a cell instead of a grave.

    When legal justice fails, vigilante justice becomes the only option.

  • Hayduke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    So…. Lemme understand this. Outright saying crazy hateful stuff is hunky dory, but correctly attributing/quoting those statements is potentially punishable at the federal level?

    …the fuck?

    They’re all mixed up, like pasta primavera.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Hey Pammy, you know that if you selectively target people for investigation/prosecution for other things based on their speech, you are still violating their constitutional rights, right? First amendment retaliation is adverse actions taken to deter or punish the exercise of your first amendment rights. You don’t have to prosecute the speech itself to violate the constitution if you are specifically targeting legal action against people because of their speech. It still chills free speech.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fucking LOL!

    Yeah. I believe that exactly as much as everything else you and your fascist compatriots have said.

  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This is exactly what liberals wanted when they passed the earliest hate speech legislation in the 90’s.
    Truly a leopards eating my face moment.