How on earth is this legal? First, taking a photo of someone in public and monetising it without their knowledge, and second using that photo in a political message the subject doesn’t agree with at all.
Absolutely bizarre.
How on earth is this legal? First, taking a photo of someone in public and monetising it without their knowledge, and second using that photo in a political message the subject doesn’t agree with at all.
Absolutely bizarre.
There are Wikimedia guidelines here, the table just says no to commercial use without clarifying (the part about NZ further down also doesn’t clarify): https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements
I am guessing there is some editorial allowance here, otherwise a freelance photographer couldn’t be paid by a newspaper. So I’m thinking the photographer selling it for editorial use on stock image sites may not actually break any rules, though I have failed to find those rules.
I did find this from the Police:
https://www.police.govt.nz/faq/what-are-rules-around-taking-photos-or-filming-public-place?nondesktop