Maple.Social
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Tony Bark@pawb.social to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 days ago

Republicans shut down House floor to avoid Epstein vote

www.newsweek.com

external-link
message-square
58
fedilink
623
external-link

Republicans shut down House floor to avoid Epstein vote

www.newsweek.com

Tony Bark@pawb.social to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 days ago
message-square
58
fedilink
Committee Democrats had planned to force a vote on a resolution calling for the public release of Epstein-related documents
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    256
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    The Democrats are trying to make a mountain out of a molehill. There’s nothing there, nothing of importance, and the Trump administration has already asked the courts to start working on the release, so there’s no point in the House getting involved anyway.

    This is such a non-issue that the Republicans have shut down the entire legislative session and won’t vote on any of their own bills until September. Again, Democrats are just trying to make a show out of nothing, which is why blocking it is the Republicans’ top priority. Their work would be redundant anyway, which is why the Republicans are so unafraid to vote on it that everyone just up and left.

    On an unrelated note, my favorite local restaurant is so clean and compliant with all regulations that when visited by the food inspector they turned out the lights, locked all the doors, and refused to serve any food again until the health department leaves. As one does when they’re unafraid and have nothing to hide.

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      112
      ·
      11 days ago

      Dear diary,

      Today someone was sarcastic on Lemmy and people liked it. Big day for the fediverse.

      • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        11 days ago

        I literally looked at the upvote as I was reading and had to question if it was sarcasm because it hadn’t been downvote into oblivion…

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        fr. I’ve actually been surprised by how little people around here seem to understand sarcasm

        • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          11 days ago

          We’re a pretty neurodivergent crowd. I thrive in sarcasm, but a lot of us come with different care instructions

          • LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            11 days ago

            That’s not the only blockage to noticing sarcasm, there are so many people who say these / the things and actually MEAN them. We need differentiators, because the crazy levels are too high to wade through.

            • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              11 days ago

              That is a difficulty. Sometimes you take a risk with a joke, and if people don’t like it? Guess what, they’re right. Humour is subjective.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        They were clear about it. Most people just write a bad take that reasonably suffers from Poe’s law and call it satire when everyone else gets mad.

    • Omnifarious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      11 days ago

      You had me in the first 2/3 there

      • misterdoctor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        11 days ago

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      11 days ago

      Had me in the 1st half, ngl

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Relevant WKUK

    • Tony Bark@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      11 days ago

      Please tell me you’re being sarcastic.

      • moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        11 days ago

        I take it you didn’t finish reading?

        • Tony Bark@pawb.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 days ago

          You have no idea how many times I’ve been wrong before. Just double checking.

      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        11 days ago

      • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        Read the whole comment instead of jumping to conclusions.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          11 days ago

        • Tony Bark@pawb.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          11 days ago

          If I was jumping to conclusions, I would have accused them. That’s why I’m asking.

  • lmdnw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    11 days ago

    “Christian” Mike Johnson doing his best to give cover to pedophiles. Wonder if him and his son discuss these sins at bedtime together while going over their porn monitoring.

  • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    11 days ago

    Can you imagine how much better off we’d be if they were this determined to do any positive thing at all in their careers?

  • shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    11 days ago

    Well that pretty much confirms it

    • Master167@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      I’ll take actions that confirms guilt for $400, Alex.

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    11 days ago

    It’s actually better if they can’t pass their shitty Republican bills. Democrats should just keep nagging about this. Either they actually have to address it, or the Republicans block themselves.

    • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 days ago

      They are doing more damage with all their other nefarious shit going around or ignoring Congress/judges/scotus/etc, we’re still in a really, really fucked up place right now and it’s still only going to get worse for the average person.

      It’ll take at least the next 2-4 years to start to show tangible devastating affects that will get millions of Americans killed with stripping away healthcare, food/snap programs, children’s cancer research being scrapped, and a list of 100 other programs being cut, gutted,or flat out just gone now and some of those programs may never come back. Shit ain’t over just cuz Congress put their feet up on the desk. Stay sharp, stay focused.

      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 days ago

        Oh, we’re absolutely fucked for at least a generation. I’m just thinking harm reduction.

        • GraniteM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          Now let’s get that on a T-shirt!

    • Tony Bark@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 days ago

      Honestly, I was thinking the same thing. The GOP are really up against rock and hard place.

  • NegativeNull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    11 days ago

  • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    11 days ago

    The GOP till about a week ago: “we need to release the files!” The GOP now: “ we need to protect the philes!”

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      😂… What a time to be alive…

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Been way more than a week, so it’s nice to see that they’re struggling to get this one to go away. Good momentum, the US needs to keep it up.

      • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yes definitely we need to spread the word and post it everywhere, make signs, call the radio stations if people still do that.

  • MuskyMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 days ago

    Guardians Of Pedophiles

  • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 days ago

    May as well hire a skywriter to put “TRUMP RAPED KIDS” above the Capitol.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      I wish. There’s a permanent restricted airspace around the capitol. In the before times, an unauthorized aircraft would get in serious trouble with the FAA. Nowadays with the sycophantic dictator in charge, who knows what could happen.

      But it’d be a damn cool way to say your last words.

      • LePoisson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Bro if you’re flying in restricted airspace near govt buildings you know what happens. You get intercepted by a fighter jet and either have a friendly escort out of the restricted area or you make friends with a missile and get obliterated.

        I would not recommend trying to find out which will happen.

        On a related note:

        I’ve been wondering if drones could be adapted to essentially act as glide bombs that could operate without direct control input. Those probably would get around most protections especially if they had a glide slope that they’d stay on if their systems were jammed electronically. Like they get launched, fly to whatever altitude they need to be at to take a long glide down, and just go for pre programmed coordinates.

        That’s probably something the war in Ukraine has either made a thing or it was tried and found to be dumb but I’ve not done research on it.

        It’s not like civilians are gonna get their hands on true missiles and launch systems. But civies could find a way to put together some drones packed with explosives pretty easily I imagine.

        • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          I think you’re right about Ukraine doing such a thing. IIRC they used drones to destroy some Russian supply depots a month or two ago. Though I think those were cabled? Which I had never heard of until then, but hey, if it works it works.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 days ago

    Think of the children!

  • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 days ago

    So, at what point do we decide they are not representing us, they are no longer a legitimate government, and we are going to rule without them?

    • KuroiKaze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      THEY NOT LIKE US

    • rozodru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      only until the American people have someone to rally behind and no one has yet to step up to that position. None of the democrats will.

      They need a leader, no one wants to lead.

      • Banana@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Anyone who wants to lead will get murdered

        • rozodru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 days ago

          exactly. that’s why no one wants to lead. Revolutions aren’t won without blood shed but no one wants to take that step.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 days ago

    Is it bcz there are people in Congress who are in the files? Sounds like they’re not just protecting Trump.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 days ago

      People in Congress and/or people who are funding people in Congress.

      • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 days ago

  • Cyberflunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    https://www.perplexity.ai/search/67b91960-caf9-4199-8315-932b7abebc38#0

    Did Mike Johnson Backtrack on Epstein Report Release?

    Johnson’s Public Position on Epstein Report

    • Previously, House Speaker Mike Johnson had publicly expressed support for releasing the Justice Department’s files on Jeffrey Epstein, echoing calls from both the MAGA base and House Democrats for “everything” to be disclosed:

      “It’s a very delicate subject, but we should — we should put everything out there and let the people decide it,” Johnson said just days before the controversy escalated[1].

    • Johnson also stated, “House Republicans advocate for transparency and are seeking ways to demonstrate that. … I have been unequivocal, and the members have expressed the same”[2].

    What Changed?

    • Despite these statements, Johnson reversed course this week, saying that he would NOT hold a House vote on measures related to releasing the Epstein files before Congress left for its August recess[1][3][4].
    • In explaining the move, Johnson argued there was “no purpose for Congress to urge an administration to do something they’re already doing,” referring to ongoing internal Justice Department processes[5][6].
    • He blamed Democrats for pushing the issue as “political games”—even as a bipartisan group of lawmakers, led by Rep. Thomas Massie, continued working to force a vote when Congress returns in September[6][3].

    Shutting Down the Floor

    • Republicans on the House Rules Committee refused to allow votes on any bills this week, out of fear Democrats would attempt to force amendments calling for the release of the Epstein files[4][7].
    • This led Johnson and GOP leaders to shut down the House early, cancelling scheduled votes and starting their August recess a day ahead of plan, essentially blocking any immediate action on the Epstein documents[8][2][6][9].
    • Johnson’s move has drawn criticism from across the political spectrum, with some accusing him of putting party politics and Trump’s interests ahead of transparency and public interest[2][1][10][11].

    Summary Table: Johnson’s Stance vs. Actions

    What Johnson Said What Johnson Did
    Supported full transparency[1] Blocked a House vote on Epstein files before recess[6][2][3]
    Urged release of all files[1] Sent House home early to avoid the vote[8][2][6][9]
    Blamed Democrats for drama[2] Accused of shielding the White House from scrutiny[11][2]

    Key Takeaways

    • Mike Johnson initially voiced support for releasing the Epstein report, backing full transparency.
    • He then blocked a House vote and adjourned Congress early, delaying any legislative push for disclosure.
    • Public reaction has been critical, with many seeing this as Johnson reversing himself to sidestep political fallout and protect the White House[1][2][4][11].

    This sequence highlights a sharp contrast between Johnson’s earlier rhetoric on transparency and his recent actions to halt legislative business on the Epstein files.

    Sources [1] Speaker Mike Johnson Backtracks on Call for DOJ to Release Epstein Files https://www.democracynow.org/2025/7/22/headlines/speaker_mike_johnson_backtracks_on_call_for_doj_to_release_epstein_files [2] Mike Johnson Under Pressure Over Shutting Down House to Stop Epstein Vote https://www.newsweek.com/mike-johnson-epstein-vote-house-2102804 [3] Johnson shuts door on House vote before September on releasing Epstein files https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/21/politics/epstein-files-house-vote-gop-johnson-massie [4] House stymied as Speaker Johnson’s hand-picked committee rebels over Epstein https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5414582-speaker-johnson-rules-committee-epstein/ [5] House ending session early as Republicans clash over Epstein vote https://apnews.com/article/congress-jeffrey-epstein-trump-f2a03eca247268b14a9e38858338eded [6] Johnson ending legislative session early over Epstein controversy as some Republicans demand answers https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/house-paralyzed-epstein-files-2nd-week-row/story?id=123953105 [7] House largely grinds to a halt over Epstein files https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/07/22/house-republicans-epstein-files-mike-johnson/ [8] Epstein crisis forces Republicans to shut down House early https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/07/22/congress/house-gop-huddles-on-epstein-drama-00466738 [9] Johnson Cuts Short House Business to Avoid Vote on Releasing Epstein Files https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/22/us/politics/mike-johnson-ends-house-session-epstein-vote.html [10] Speaker Johnson reverses course on Epstein transparency, realigns with Trump https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/speaker-johnson-reverses-course-epstein-transparency-realigns-trump-rcna220197 [11] Johnson Does a Full 180 on Epstein Files After Hearing ‘the President’s Heart’ https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/mike-johnson-shuts-down-house-trump-epstein-files.html [12] House cancels votes amid fight over Jeffrey Epstein files https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-cancels-votes-fight-jeffrey-epstein-files-rcna220238 [13] Johnson tries to contain Epstein dissent https://www.politico.com/newsletters/inside-congress/2025/07/23/johnson-tries-to-contain-epstein-dissent-00469082 [14] Johnson confirms: No vote on Epstein before recess https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/07/21/congress/johnson-epstein-vote-recess-00465643 [15] House Speaker Johnson explains why he won’t force … - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6spfpC4IAa8 [16] Johnson sending House home early amid push to force Epstein files vote https://www.cbsnews.com/news/johnson-house-recess-epstein-files-vote/ [17] Why House Republican leaders closed up shop to stop more votes on the Epstein files https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/epstein-files-trump-house-mike-johnson-rcna220266 [18] Johnson shuts down House for the summer to sideline calls for Epstein transparency https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/speaker-ends-house-session-early-as-gop-clashes-over-epstein-files-vote

  • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 days ago

    The entire top level of the current GOP is a pedophile, christofascist cult.

  • Avicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 days ago

    Well from now whenever republicans defecate some sentences involving “but the kids” from their mouths the default reply should be “Oh like the time you didn’t release Epstein files?”

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.1K users / day
  • 3.45K users / week
  • 5.95K users / month
  • 18.4K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 25K subscribers
  • 7.18K Posts
  • 85.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org