Useless. Time for the Social Democrats to form their own party.

  • RattlerSix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m sure to get dumped on for saying this but ya’ll need to chill out. President’s generally have authority to carry out military strikes. I can’t think of one in my lifetime that didn’t bomb somebody without congressional approval beforehand. Declaring war is a different matter but all the differences and nuances and where exactly the lines are, is not something courts have ever really figured out.

    This impeachment resolution specifically said he declared war and he should be impeached because it’s Congress’ job to declare war. That’s the entirety of the complaint. It’s short. And it’s lazy. He didn’t declare war. He certainly risked starting a war, but he didn’t declare one. Democrats would have looked stupid for impeaching him for something he didn’t actually do and it would have failed just on the language alone. It did fail. And it should have.

    All this ‘democrats are traitors’ or ‘they’re supporting fascism’ or ‘stabbing us in the back’ is crazy. They put forth a really bad impeachment resolution and it got shot down. You should be mad at AOC and Green for putting up a horrible impeachment resolution. It probably looked better last week when it looked like a real war might happen, but I don’t see anything impeachable here. If there is something, it’s deep and nuanced, it’s something that no one has ever agreed on the interpretation of, it’s something that Congress has let Presidents get away with for decades.

    We’re not getting rid of this asshole by persuading the public that he disobeyed some highly nuanced technicality that nobody even agrees on. Shit, I’m getting sleepy just thinking about listening to a congressional hearing on it.

    • kyrax1213@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I don’t get it. What’s there to chill out about? Is it fine to bomb another country just because war wasn’t officially declared?

    • Ougie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Funny how when America got bombed it was perceived as a clear declaration of war… Those double standards my guy

      • RattlerSix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        If you’re talking about American public opinion having double standards, ok. If you’re talking about me, you’re putting words in my mouth.

        • Ougie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Correct me if I’m reading your post wrong, but you stated that people should chill out about this declaration of war because he didn’t actually declare a war, he just casually dropped some bombs. I understand that to mean that people should accept the irrationality because somehow the US doesn’t have a system in place to police itself. Curious how that would play out if other countries did the same. Oh no we didn’t declare war, it was this fat idiot Hirohito going rogue again, oopsie. Time for peace now, thank you for your attention to this matter.