First of all, this is bullshit - every one of the 128 Democrats needs to be primaried out asap. (which of them are up in midterms?)
Second of all, this is another deliberate swipe at AOC and this will not stand, man.
Thirdly - however. We did this with Gee Dubz in early 2000s. Launching a missile strike without Congress’ input was already hashed out, and the president can do it. They did it by some bullshit where “going to war” is a whole seal, stamp, and magic incantation hullaballoo. If you remember Hillary voting for the Iraq War II, that was what that was about - they got to a point where Gee Dubz time had run out and he would either have to cut the shit or Congress would have to let him do it. Yes, Dems ate shit back then too, yes. NOT ALL - we had AOCs back then too. But the old ones were “only” sixty back then.
Fourthly - this was never going to go anywhere because we’d need 20 House republiQans to give up their lucrative careers to join in the effort which would then die in the Senate again.
And Lastly - I don’t know what 128 Democrats got for what will be costly to them personally, but it was something. Was it worth it? Let’s make sure it was not.
And rightfully so. My question is - what did they get for it? Did the DNC ask for it in exchange for something, or did the republiQans ask for it in exchange for something? Or, because we are where we are, did they just do it because they’re that awful?
I think the prevailing sentiment is the latter on here, but in the world of politics every vote is a bartering tool.
First of all, this is bullshit - every one of the 128 Democrats needs to be primaried out asap. (which of them are up in midterms?)
Second of all, this is another deliberate swipe at AOC and this will not stand, man.
Thirdly - however. We did this with Gee Dubz in early 2000s. Launching a missile strike without Congress’ input was already hashed out, and the president can do it. They did it by some bullshit where “going to war” is a whole seal, stamp, and magic incantation hullaballoo. If you remember Hillary voting for the Iraq War II, that was what that was about - they got to a point where Gee Dubz time had run out and he would either have to cut the shit or Congress would have to let him do it. Yes, Dems ate shit back then too, yes. NOT ALL - we had AOCs back then too. But the old ones were “only” sixty back then.
Fourthly - this was never going to go anywhere because we’d need 20 House republiQans to give up their lucrative careers to join in the effort which would then die in the Senate again.
And Lastly - I don’t know what 128 Democrats got for what will be costly to them personally, but it was something. Was it worth it? Let’s make sure it was not.
all of them are up in the midterms, these are congressmen, they only serve 2 year terms. fuck them, primary out these asshats.
You are correct - including 33 Senate seats (including Susan Collins).
Know Your Primaries! If this doesn’t get you to look up who’s running, what will?
I think your fourth point is what frustrates me the most. This was a symbolic vote and they couldn’t even do that.
And rightfully so. My question is - what did they get for it? Did the DNC ask for it in exchange for something, or did the republiQans ask for it in exchange for something? Or, because we are where we are, did they just do it because they’re that awful?
I think the prevailing sentiment is the latter on here, but in the world of politics every vote is a bartering tool.
You’re wrong. They did vote symbolically. They voted to support Trump and his actions.
They are not on your side.