The state had argued that the group didn’t engage in “distinctively religious activities” and didn’t assert “a religious objection to contributing to unemployment insurance.”
The state had argued that the group didn’t engage in “distinctively religious activities” and didn’t assert “a religious objection to contributing to unemployment insurance.”
From what I can tell, it was only for a subsidiary charity that doesn’t have religious duties. I don’t think they should have it.
Churches get away with murder under conservative rule. Churches should fall under nonprofit rules if they meet the requirements. They should not have their own status.