Albertan here. We can always count on Smith to make Ford sound like a statesman.

Stupid people voting against their own best interests isn’t news.

Why?

You’re actually asking why?

Because Mark Zuckerberg is a fucking Nazi, just like Trump and Musk.

A more interesting question to me would be "What are the chances that the 2028 elections are allowes to be carried out freely (e.g. without the governing powers forcing the outcome they want)?

If he lives to the end of this term, 100% that he’ll try for a third.

By then, it’ll be a battle between Republican Nazis who back him blindly, and Republican Nazis who want a more competent puppet in power. Oh, and people who aren’t actively supporting fascism. I doubt they’ll make a difference.

Professor Kitzel.

How did a convicted criminal get into Canada while skipping out on his sentence?

Deport this fucker, unless he runs into an accident on the slopes.

Every one of those terrible picks has been a deliberate, careful choice to destabilize the country.

What kinda bullshit ranting is this?

As someone not in the US, I’m hoping someone can explain.

Trump isn’t in office yet. How can he have any say in this, other than just blowing hot air?

Nobody cares what this Nazi sychophant thinks.

Christofascists.

That’s how and that’s why.

Sure. But saying “that’s how things go” ignores the context of the overall atmosphere of fear and intimidation against anti-genocide activists.

I don’t actually agree.

Indigo is required, legally, to defend their trademarks or risk losing them. They have to go to court on cases like this. If they went to court and the judge said “fair use” then they wouldn’t be terribly harmed; but if they didn’t go to court, then there is a chance someone else could open up a bookstore, copy their material, and point to their lack of protection as justification.

And if you’re taken to court and don’t show up, it is guaranteed that you’re going to lose.

I hate to say it, but fighting corporations (or governments!) requires commitment - which means money and lawyers and risk. Setting up a protest website is easy - but protecting it can be hard and uncomfortable. Screaming “this company is bad” is easy, but fighting them can destroy your life. If you want to change the world, you have to fucking COMMIT!

Please don’t mistake my comments though - I fully support the fight against Indigo funding Israel’s genocide, and have lost friends over the issue. But if you accuse me of ignoring the context of anti-genocide protests, then I could say you’re ignoring the context of generic, boring, due legal process in the matter.

The article is a bit much.

So the group used Indigo trademarks and logos in their protest material. Indigo then went to court to protect it, as they must do. It probably should have been ruled as fair use, but the accused didn’t go to court to defend their use of the material.

That’s how things go. If they had defended their fair use, Indigo would probably have lost. But they didn’t.

All of the creative content he has been training his fancy autocomplete on. My data, your comments, my cousin’s art portfolio, he either stole or paid someone else to steal through partnerships.

“Whiny lying billionaire thief complains about whiny psychpathic megabillionaire having more clout.”