Ask them what their 6-7 favorite features are

Disappointed by the amount of upvotes though

Also Odyssey

https://odysee.com/@PressTV:2

I can access it over Tor with Netherlands endpoint

Mine is constantly going off all the time, like I’m preparing an argument of some sort (which usually has nothing to do with what I need to be doing) and need to process all the information I can over and over again to make sure everything lines up. If someone talks for more than 5 seconds my own internal monologue kicks in until the person stops or like 30 seconds pass and I realize it distracted me. Makes it difficult to read as well, and on bad occasions it can last for hours. The only time this doesn’t happen is if I’m intensely focused on something like a self-driven programming project.

Probably avoid Google Pixels then. They use Tensor chips, which have poor performance.

Disagree here. Maybe it’s worse than other current flagships, but the performance is nowhere near as bad as the cheap budget phones I’ve had before. When I got my Pixel the performance felt like an upgrade from my Samsung phone so I wouldn’t discount it.

I use a Pixel 6 Pro with GrapheneOS, if you decide to go that route I would do at least a Pixel 8 or wait for the GrapheneOS phone release.

Funny enough initially in the Bible people weren’t supposed to eat meat at all, then they loosened the restrictions but had rules for certain species (although I don’t recall if animal sacrifices started before or after this). Then in the new testament they did away with a bunch of rules but in a very vague way so Christians get to cherry pick what they want and when then argue about it with other Christians. Although there was also a story about a blanket or something with a ton of “bad” meat where god said to eat so I guess that counts as justification

In the Bible they had to make a law against it

Wow, that was a loud blast

deleted by creator

For private projects I use Forgejo on my device that hosts various other servers

I think they meant not having a great firewall, which they don’t need since they’ll use military and economic force instead

Right now the one I’m in arrested dozens of students for opposing genocide and shut down the student newspaper for supporting said students and has Lockheed Martin embedded in every crevice, and on top of that are enacting other dumb rules like ebike bans and the stuff they teach is like 20 years out of date

Universities, really good if not best (as an academic)

What are you talking about?

I believe Trump is moving the US in the right direction, whereas a good president would be moving the US in the left direction

Engaging algorithm, no paywall, funding or monetization strategy, viewpoint diversity, and a large amount of people already using it

At my university there are CS clubs specifically for women because only like 1% of the CS students in both classes and clubs are female

Ok then let’s dissect your statement.

Short term gain.

Not a complete sentence so not even sure what this means. But when taking it into the context of my statement that you replied to (which was about the effectiveness of the protests), I assume you’re saying that I was focusing on short-term gain in contrast to focusing on the long term when determining the effectiveness of the protests. Which hints that I should be taking different aspects into consideration and arguing differently. Which is a position, which I then assume you intend to defend.

If the topic wasn’t about the effectiveness, which was the primary topic of the comment you replied to, that should have been clarified.

It’s more about long term awareness.

Based on what’s inferred from the previous statement, this further validates its intent. It also brings up what specifically should be considered when arguing differently, which is “awareness”.

It is unfortunate for those now. But

“Some of what you said is correct, but…” Argumentative-style writing, reinforcing the intent stated earlier.

it’s not something that changes overnight.

Based on the context of the previous statements, reiterates that the effectiveness is determined by the long term, specifically “awareness”, as opposed to how I measured it.

So it seems like you were trying to justify something.

The way you initially commented made it seem like you were arguing that long-term awareness justifies its classification as “very” effective and I’m arguing that it doesn’t. And now you’re saying that you’re arguing the same thing I am, so I can’t even tell what your stance is at this point or why you brought it up.