Joey Joe Joe!!

Your German is excellent!

On WABC (AM 770 in my area) they literally tried to put a negative spin on this! Apparently, since he’s already a millionaire, he doesn’t need it! Evil guy! They even played the clip of him talking about going door to door and no one told him they’re concerned the mayor doesn’t make enough. Beyond fucking delusional. I turn that shit on when I’m looking for maximum and immediate cognitive dissonance.

Literally the stupidest fuckin thing anyone could say about this.

Hey! These bruises are just makeup!

Well since he’s already metaphorically done it, I guess they figured they might as well set a literal precedent.

Edit: Also, gives me Man in The High Castle vibes. Did we switch to a timeline adjacent or something somehow?

Again it is literally not what you are continually stating in your comments: “editorializing the title” and even then I clearly posted the title and my particular bullshit afterwards. Rewrite the rule more carefully, or continue having this argument almost every single day with various parties (seems a common occurrence from my passive observation). Need not discuss it more; I’ve already altered my post to appease you. Just wish you’d understand your obvious and blatant error (and so do others).

Well you should make it a rule then. I’m pretty sure you just enjoy gaslighting. Or you could remove the article for my aforementioned reason: the whole reason behind posting it is editorial/critical: please remove it for that!

Hey now, I did not alter the title. And that’s what is clearly cited in the 1st rule. Altering. I added editorial context; the whole point of my post was to editorialize the title, and article contents. It was silly, I guess.

Anyways, I enjoyed this little exchange of ours. I’m gonna alter my title, just in case this develops.

“The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.” Same as it always has been.

“Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.”

Posted exact title: check. Added relevant context: check. Editorialized in the body: check.

Edit: it’s not very popular anyway. Pretty sure I did not successfully get my point across and now the post just feels inappropes.

So they’re releasing dangerous criminals onto the street, and doing their best to hide any and all information about it. Understood.

I’m pretty sure they mean Matt Walsh’s media empire, unless the situation has changed.

Jesus, I thought it said Iran instead of ice. And I was thinking how that is kind of a stupid idea. What a fucking timeline.

Billionaires need to be liquidated.

The Nation sniping the Atlantic; what a time to be alive!

It’s also signature, he’s said it about people tons of times. “Great guy, wonderful guy. Didn’t know him. Never met him.”

That article didn’t seem to want me to know what the meme he posted was. Think it was this: here

I mean, you can be arrested for breathing, being black on a Friday night, anything. Though I have historically heard that cops are to be avoided at all costs in the south.

Just them being more transparent than ever, as its the style these days. Additional corrections include Jack Posobiec being a longstanding outspoken racist. And they go on to quote his drivel. These organizations get paid to propagandize, sanitize, and force narratives, and it’s never been more obvious. But it’s getting expensive! And it is all soon to be under the same umbrella of Paramount state-sponsored slop or someother.

Gee I sure am glad polygraph tests are proven lie detectors and have no issues whatsoever! It’s almost like hearing someone mention phrenology now.

I call for a permanent kerning and specific stylization of the letter “I” so this issue is not further confused.