• 0 Posts
  • 79 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2024

help-circle


  • To expand on what @[email protected] said, this analysis ranges from reductive to completely ahistorical.

    Women have been part of the productive workforce long before the notion of equality was even on the table. The idea that women were exclusively bearing and rearing children before the industrial revolution is nonsense, women were crucial workers in agriculture and manufacture and it was impossible for a family to be fed only by the patriarch.

    The relationship between capitalism and feminism is actually partly the other way around from what you are presenting. Industrialization required centralization and urbanization, which meant it was easier than ever for women to organize with their colleagues and comrades and demand equal rights. It also eased access to weapons, which allowed for direct violent action to force the ruling class to pay attention. Capitalism accelerated or even sometimes spawned feminist movements, which were always in direct contradiction with the actual capitalists who were entirely male at the time.

    The idea that women haven’t won anything is just bullshit. You are right that they didn’t “win” the “right to work”, because they had that “right” forever. But what they actually did win is a smaller gender gap in pay and economic opportunities, access to better education, right to political representation, legal prohibitions on some kinds of gender violence. If you think all of this was somehow “granted” by (male) capitalists because it is profitable, that’s just untrue, most of it was directly or indirectly hurtful to the ruling class when those measures were first introduced.






  • Great assessment TBH. Iran is clearly posturing here, they haven’t won yet, even though the US did lose already.

    US plutocrats don’t actually care that much whether the stock market is red or green in the short term, they will make money from it either way. I think the existing strategy of jacking up oil prices (which will impact the economy long-term) and also hitting their assets directly where possible (e.g. datacenters and refineries) will have more impact.

    However, it is also possible that with some reshuffling of the demands the ceasefire might actually hold. If they allow Trump to not lose face, they could get most of their demands practically met and be the ultimate victors in this. I hope this is how it goes, otherwise we might see a worldwide famine due to fertilizer shortages by the end of this year.







  • I technically have three names (given name, patronymic, family name). I’ve lived in a few countries, all with different name systems. I’ve found that this is the best easiest rule set to avoid trouble:

    • If possible, use only the first and family name, those are very widely understood.
      • If possible, when making a passport in your country of origin, request that those are the only names recorded, and they are transliterated into latin according to some official (or at least widely recognized) ruleset.
    • If possible, use the latin transliterations as written in the passport.
      • Otherwise, look up official transliteration rules from latin to local language and use those.
      • Don’t try transliterating by yourself, or transliterating from the original names, it will cause issues.
      • If some system somewhere transliterates your names otherwise, complain loudly before they get committed anywhere.
      • If the local system forces you to have a “common” first name and your name doesn’t fit, choose one that’s as close as possible to the rules described above. If there is no close alternative, choose the one you like, but be prepared for issues down the road.
    • If possible, leave all other names as blank, otherwise as -.
      • Don’t try fitting a “middle name” from one system into another.
      • If possible, avoid fitting into the local system at all, e.g. don’t make up a second family name even if the system calls for it. In my case, I didn’t reuse the patronymic even when the local system had it as well, because my father’s name is obviously not a local name so it would look really weird.
      • If asked, say you don’t have any other names.

    Of course, this is just what worked best in my specific situations, other countries may be different.

    And also, I don’t care at all about my legal name (all my friends call me by another name anyways) so I’m fine dropping a part of it, the goal here is to just make interactions with governments, banks, etc as smooth and easy as possible.


  • The checks and balances are working mostly as intended. The purpose of the system is:

    1. Protect the oligarchy from external threats, should any anti-oligarch politician slip by all the various election disenfranchisement techniques,
    2. Moderate any conflicts between factions of the oligarchy to stabilize the dictatorship of the capital.

    As far as I can tell,

    1. Billionaires are making more billions every day while the rest struggle to get by,
    2. Almost all dem politicians and their wealthy neoliberal donors are doing alright despite a literal fascist party being in power.

    Besides, even when someone like Mamdani gets elected, they can’t effect any meaningful change because they are “checked” by the pro-capitalist legislature and “balanced” by the corrupt judiciary.

    It doesn’t need a reboot, it needs a complete realignment of who’s in charge.