My point really doesn’t have anything to do with the semantics of the word promise. At the end of the day the implication or promise or idea was there that he wasn’t going to run again and then he announced which pretty much tanked the public’s ability to have faith in Kamala before the fact and made it further untenable for her to separate herself from his policies.

My point, in response to the original post, was that it isn’t that he should’ve dropped out earlier it’s that he should’ve never run again at all.

Calling yourself a “transition president“, and then not announcing your intention to run for reelection until after the inauguration is doing far more than implying.

3. Biden should have been a one term president since that’s what he said he was going to do at the beginning of his term. Reneging on that promise made them look desperate.

Hypothetically, yes, independents could have a majority. Realistically… no.

Most people seem to have decided that one is on Biden for some reason, including Biden.

A church providing transportation to a polling place, which were I live are often churches themselves, is very different than a pastor endorsing a candidate during a service.

It’s not just Black people he is trying to do this to. He has been trying to kill Native Americans’ birthright citizenship since day one.

In fact, we have been waiting for decades for our promised voting members of congress. My personal conspiracy theory is that this is the real reason they won’t uncap the House.

The legality of emulating current gen hardware has already been decided. (At least in the US)

I wouldn’t be surprised if she just heard somebody else say cabinet meeting and she thought it sounded cool.

No we wouldn’t. Those treaties included things like voting members of congress that we are still fighting for over a century later.

I have very mixed feelings about RISC-V since the non-profit organization moved their headquarters to Switzerland after taking a bunch of US tax dollars and grants to develop it at UC Berkeley.

This looks really cool, but I have immediate concerns about the lack of ZIF socket for something designed to take 30 year old chips.

AFAIK sworn affidavits would be required for turning over video evidence as well as eyewitness testimony, the article even mentions that one of the witnesses signing an affidavit was one of the recorders.

You don’t mean the same guy who took out full page ads calling for the execution of the Central Park 5???

My ancestors were forced from their land by the American government in an event known as the Trail of Tears. So this is kinda a mixed bag for me really…

I think people tend to forget that at the Alamo they were fighting to protect slavery… Texas has always been a refuge of those who seek to oppress.

You didn’t even need the trailer. The teaser poster was cooler than the whole movie. 9 year old me was fucking stoked just seeing this:

For sure it’s been an option since 7, but I feel like I remember there being a way to do something similar in XP.

I am like 97% sure it’s already just a macro key that simulates a press of win+ctrl+c or something like that that can be changed in the registry. They added a bunch of combos that open office apps and shit a while back.

But you can also just pin Terminal or any other app to your taskbar and then press win+[number desired pinned app is away from start button/search/task/whatever].