• 0 Posts
  • 2 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: December 7th, 2023

help-circle
  • SpaceX in its short lifetime has had more catastrophic failures more often than the entire history of NASA.

    To build “cheap” prototypes and learn from their failure is their whole business model. And it’s working. Their rockets don’t fail on missions, they fail while testing.

    SpaceX has done nothing that NASA couldn’t have done had we funded it.

    I disagree. NASA is a government agency and by nature it’s held down by bureaucracy and moves at a snail’s place. There’s no incentive for them to keep to a budget and timeline.

    What NASA is really good at are robotics and observational science. I think they should be funded to put tech in space and on other celestial objects, and the dirty work of getting stuff off the ground should be delegated to private companies.


  • He wants to keep the money despite his rocket programs literally blowing up in everyone’s faces

    What are you yapping about?

    • SpaceX is the most prolific space company in recent history, performing a launch every 3 days on average.
    • Falcon 9 is the most reliable launch system in in world.
    • Besides the 60 year old Soyuz, Dragon is the only human certified spacecraft capable of delivering crews to and from the ISS.
    • Starship is the largest rocket prototype -and manmade object- to leave the atmosphere.

    And they did all this in the last 10 years.

    Shitting on SpaceX just because Elon’s name is attached to it, -trendy as it may be right now- is dismissing the work of the engineers who made all this possible.

    And no, I’m not sucking Elon’s dick.

    In fact, the only reason SpaceX works well is because, allegedly, there’s a wall of people shielding the company from Elon’s batshit insanity. If it wasn’t for them, he would have ran it to the ground already.