No thanks, our conservatives are further to the left than your Democrats, and California has the population of the rest of Canada combined. You can make your own country

If you aren’t using both Reddit and Lemmy, then you clearly aren’t the target audience

I can quit anytime. Right after I see what’s after the next blind.

Balatro

At least you aren’t going to die becoming a southern belle.

Abiotic Factor. An absolutely amazing survival crafter. From someone who was sick and tired of survival crafters.

I’ll be back in five moons, we’re running out of mammoth meat (translation)

If the person I will report to can’t code, I pass on the contract

I get this, it’s really frustrating to have a clueless manager. But to me, a bigger problem is the reverse.

I’d rather have a manager with no technical ability and excellent people skills, than a manager with excellent technical ability but no people skills. The latter is all too common in my experience.

Alternatively steam link / moonlight

deleted by creator

Kind of surprised no one has mentioned it… But kids. Kids bring a lot of happiness.

I’m not American and I almost never read the Times, so I don’t have first hand experience. But I hear the same rhetoric about outlets here in Canada.

My take is that yes, outlets can have bias on certain issues, but that doesn’t mean we should write them off completely. Trust in media is at an all time low, journalism is struggling to survive. There’s no media outlet in the world that doesn’t make the kinds of mistakes that you outline here. The key is how do they respond to them after the fact. Do they issue corrections? How quickly? Where do they put them?

Some of your ‘evidence’ also doesn’t seem like journalistic malpractice. For example, are they obfuscating poor sources, or not revealing an anonymous source? The latter is not malpractice. The former doesn’t sound bad either… Who decides if a source is poor? Maybe the source didn’t have much to contribute so that’s why there wasn’t much detail on their background. I’m not arguing that you’re wrong, just that as an outside observer that point doesn’t seem very bad.

Anyway, I do think it’s important to be aware of any biases in the media we consume, so conversations like this are important. But my fear is that if the conclusion is to wholesale stop trusting the media anytime they make a mistake or a bias is revealed (I.e all media outlets), we’re going to be even more fucked than we already are.