

1·
14 hours agoWhat should a state do when the most prolific invader in the world - NATO - starts amassing weapons and troops on that state’s borders?
Also, it is rich to call Russia “aggressive” when NATO was self-admittedly pushing for war with Russia.
It is similarly silly to claim that Ukraine is fighting for survival, considering that Ukraine could have just accepted peace with Russia during negotiations at many points, including in March 2022.
It has invaded Iraq, Syria, and Iran at the very least, which helps the Pissraeli genocide of Palestine. It has also attempted to formally join the most prolific invader in the world, as well as to help NATO attack Russia.
Of course a person like you, who supports the most prolific invader in the world isn’t going to support peace on terms not dictated by the most prolific invader in the world.
This just shows that you lied that Ukraine has no choice, and now you are trying to lie as if those peace terms were somehow bad.
Amusing how you don’t respect the wishes of the people of Crimea, even when NATO’s own studies concur that that is what they wanted.
Everybody wants more. But, if course, you aren’t talking literally and actually mean some of your racist fantasies about your enemies being as bad as you.
You are just describing NATO’s behaviour, but imply that the rest of the world does not have a right to defend itself against you.
Your empire pushed for war with Russia. You don’t get to complain about being beaten.
Now, answer the question:
What should a state do when the most prolific invader in the world - NATO - starts amassing weapons and troops on that state’s borders?