Fadear Creek Road, about 45 kilometres northeast of Kamloops.

Nah you are correct, but the autocorrect is 'murrican and gaslit me.

Well, yes and no.

Mass social change requires protests as a baseline of dissent. They should be menacing, but remain only a threat to power, which is their primary purpose. A non-peaceful protest is unskilled and uncoordinated use of violence,and gives authoritarians an alibi for escalating repression. This is why they send in agent provocateurs.

A march turned mob is a huge error. You need coordination and planning for revolutionary violence, even mass rebellion.

In between the necessary peaceful marches and that hopefully avoidable bloody rebellion, there is the opportunity for a lot of targeted activism, based on the leverage that the threat provides. It’s also a period of targeted sabotage and vandalism, as well as widespread passive resistance. More importantly, it is a delay in which to network, organize, and develop coordinated strategies. Fail to plan, plan to fail.

This way, there is a time tested path to rule by the people, AKA democracy, without violence. Failure of this method is the violent insurrection, which can lead to interesting things like Nepal (though the violence was VERY disciplined, despite appearances). It can also lead to Pol Pot.

Pol Pot killed 30% of the nation using words.

Oh yay, slavery and torture for our enemies, that will fix everything.

Ehrm. That’s reactionary, not revolutionary. Not even funny, really.

Annotations could be a separate call based on a simple section tag with an id, very compatible.

Yes, the correct way to display a short simple document like this is plain html with bog-standard structure and indexing/metatext markup plus device and accessibility targeted css. That is it. Any scripts or references should fail fully gracefully back to web 1.0.

I am pretty sure that was generalized to all the population.

I interviewed old timers who were involved in the early unionization struggles of auto workers and other industries. Those folks really lived under the thumb of landlords and employers and segregation and so much more bullshit than people remember.

Resistance to employer shit and abuse develops by people being neighbourly and helpful, by building bonds, by sharing their common outrage, and by connecting the dots.

Talk about pay with coworkers, it’s illegal for an employer to restrict such talk. You don’t necessarily have to unionize, but you do have to organize. This means finding solidarity at work, even if the coworkers are boring or misogynistic or different.

You know, apes strong together and all that. Build community around resistance to authoritarianism.

What would you have a normal person who likely can’t afford to miss much in the way of work do? I am asking sincerely.

Thank you for honouring the spirit of a forum. The honest answer, from an old fuck’s perspective, is that it entirely depends on

• what you know
• what you are capable of
• what opportunity you have
• and who you know

Outside of throwing everything away to Luigi it up, I’m not sure what a single person could hope to accomplish.

Ah, then that suggests is the first few steps should be seen as ‘helpful training’, until you develop a sense of the first item, what you know. A single person can in fact achieve a huge amount, even without thinking so.

So read and watch about resistance to authoritarianism, wherever it arises. Develop a personal curriculum. Ask old folks like me who have been involved in people’s resistance to authoritarianism for a long time, who they like to read.

Unless, of course, if studying history or political thought isn’t your thing.

In that case, start at grassroots in a service position so you can connect with the issues of the people who are the worst victims of abuse, find out how they got there, and what they need. A soup kitchen or something. Maybe stick to secular organizations.

Even considering the protests, which one would think have had enough people to accomplish something an individual could not… what exactly are they to do that would make things better? Seems like the nonviolent protests are just being ignored to me, but even if they were violent, what exactly are they to direct it towards?

Antonio Gramsci was imprisoned by the OG fascists for years, but he smuggled out his writings, which included an analysis of how social movements turn into hegemonic power, which kind of answers your question.

TL;DR: think of social change as walking like a millipede, not a person. There are many leaders, many strikes and protests, many interests coming together, and culture or propaganda is a big part of it working. Educate yourself and your peers.

It’s a thing I have been wondering in the face of the calls to “do something”, and I don’t know the answer to what this “something” is.

Yeah, if you’re a lawyer you don’t really have to ask this question. If you’re a retail worker or a warehouse gnome, okay then, those are limiting circumstances so just bide your time and listen to audiobooks or lectures on the bus, then put in a couple of hours a week or month at a soup kitchen etc…

That ‘something’ just boils down to actively making a better society, however you can, but you know, all the time really. It will develop from there.

I think that was an actual question and invitation to dialogue, and your first response is to disavow? You mistake genuine concern for anger?

Why?

That’s not logical, nobody but you is saying that.

In English, “you” can refer to an individual or a group.

Apply the group in this context. Each member of a group taking care of their individual mandate of responsibility is collective action.

So no, to your question, no-one meant that.

“Critical Race Theory is propaganda.”

“Systemic racism [in x y z / Quebec] is a myth.”

Settler states always have this stuff in varying degrees, whether fascist or centrist. Capitalism just makes it worse.

Decolonize the mind and state.

This is a terrible statement on ethics, or an excellent condemnation of organized faith under authority.

You can choose a mosque or church or temple, or choose not to associate at all where the common practice is to include unrepentant authoritarians. This does not require you to abandon your core beliefs.

The basic lesson of the 20th century, for all humanity, is to tolerate all behaviour except the oppressive and, ironically, the intolerant.

Grammar. I can’t parse what you are trying to say, but I am going to guess that it is a defence of Paulism.

The kid said “churches”. It’s right there.

Krasnov was told to raise the price of oil to over $100/ barrel. Mother Russia needs high oil prices to fund the war.

So, pressure for Iran to mine the strait is coming from both adversary and ally. Poor Ukraine.

Hm, enormous corpulent worm? Maybe

Was he an asshole? Or was he writing a commission with malicious compliance? For a historically verified asshole?