Pika

That’s interesting to hear. I really didn’t think they were gonna be doing much gameplay element changes past full release, but it’s nice to see they’re still adding.

The random nodes part I think I would really like because it does add a little difference to the static map. But hopefully it’s a separate option than the finite nodes because I still don’t think I would want the nodes to run out on me!

Well this was a no brainer, I don’t know if anyone in the topic really believed game devs liked it, Executive and financing though? They love it.

But… “leadership and executive love DLSS 5” sounds worse than “Game Dev’s Love DLSS 5”.

The game devs position gives a false sense of security of “oh well maybe it isn’t actually a bad thing”… the other just sounds like cost saving.

Fair, I have massive packrack tendancies, I hate tearing things down to move them elsewhere so I like the infinite resources in satisfactory… The rebuild syndrome is bad enough whenever a tier changes, I struggled hard with factorios balance of defense and finite resources! It still was fun though

I love both of them. I just could never get into how resource nodes expired/ran out on factorio, Satisfactory really gave me a scare when they said that they were thinking about implementing limited time resource nodes. But I’m glad that they didn’t end up doing it.

I love how accurate to satisfactory that is. During that stage, it takes so long for reinforced frames to go through.

Honestly, he doesn’t need to, All he has to do is have Congress go into adjournment on the 10th day of the bill being in his hand. And then when he doesn’t sign it, it’s supposed to go back to Congress. However, if Congress is adjourned, the bill gets pocket vetoed without the ability to be brought up again.

I’m partially expecting with how much support has changed so drastically that that’s what the current plan is. Just have Congress go into adjournment. It prevents the house from bringing it up again as the bill gets fully tossed if I understand it correctly

although I guess that is under the statement that he can get the house to close again

deleted by creator

I can’t say I blame them tbh I think I would do the same

ok that makes more sense, thank you

I’ve read this four times now and I can’t comprehend what they’re talking about.

So is this going to lower or raise the price? Because it sounds like they’re advocating torwards being against low prices? I don’t understand

Now that I’ve read it a second time, it sounds like they’re trying to keep the price low and it backfired because now it sounds like they’ve lost market share which is causing the price to recoil downward again?

Ontario had the right idea imo, embargo US goods and then push through the struggles. Sadly it seems they were the only one willing to play hard ball. Everyone else folded like a deck of cards.

I want to add, this was an existing ruling, they just clarified the rule. Every article it seems is using each-others clickbait titles(the linked article even references it in the edit).

The change that they made was that they added a dedicated section to the developer guidelines, where before they only had it on their pricing page.

This rule has been in effect for 5 years now according to steamdb.

If this movement becomes a thing, its about time.

It seems like it’s been over 8 years of this aim high swing low BS where only the democrats are willing to settle for less where the republicans block anything that remotely hurts them, and if they are finally coming to terms that taking the moral high ground doesn’t work when a side isn’t willing to cooperate then good for them. I had lost faith that they actually had the moral compass to allow for it.

they already tried that, it failed 19-20 to get the votes required to subpoena.

Honestly, pay needs to be capped at their current states minimum wage imo.

Being said I also believe that all public positions should be like how the president is. Where everything is paid for by the yearly budget. I also think that all public positions should be isolated from personal finances. You are public position representing the US, you have zero need of accessing anything in your financials. I personally believe all assets should be frozen as soon as you take your seat. (or at the least put into bonds or something)

Yeah but it was more so talking about how when Democrats are in power it’s okay to criticize both Democrat and republicans, however once Republicans are in power you’re not allowed to criticize Republicans because the power stigma shifts.

something that I’ve started noticing as of late as well. If you try to criticize the Republican Party you’ll be met with resistance, arguments and full shutdown leadin to personal attacks, where if you criticize the Democratic Party, they will still disagree with what you say but they’ll at least listen to you.

While I think desalination is the way to go in the long run, I am concerned about the state of Texas being the one to do it. You know corners will be cut every step of the way there. Desalination is still eco unfriendly even when dealt with properly, if you cut those corners the damages can be devastating. The brine created destroys the eco-balance where-ever its spread over even in low amounts. Killing basically everything present. A large scale of such a project might also impact more than just the coastal waters in the gulf, that current gets swept past florida, so this could also be effecting florida’s coastal industry as well.

I’m just waiting for Doctors to start leaving Texas like they have been Florida. Not sure why they would wanna risk their license.

I mean, they posted the other day funding for the same fund between Biden and Trump, they are definitly funneling money in to do this. I think it should be expected at this point, should be looking into how to outlaw it rather than worrying if its going to happen. If it’s legal, it will be abused. The fact that it’s legal in the first place is the issue.

Being said, it goes to say, I believe an anti-trust case still goes through legal provisions, so I think he could just pardon the entire case.

I foresee part of his funding being explicitly for that.

Sadly the US government functions vastly on the honor and trust system, if you have elected officials that aren’t honorary, the system can and will be abused as there isn’t very much actual checks and balances on it for individual cases. The checks and balances existing almost completely skip the supreme court, and the actual positions of power such as the speaker, the VP and the president do not have many checks and balances for the position itself, relying on the branch itself to keep itself in line and once someone that is found untrustworthy is placed into the position, its likely not going to be reverted. It’s very much a “we investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing” scenario.

I like this change, I don’t think it will really matter in the long run sadly, not to say it shouldn’t be attempted but, I really think every proactive thing is going to be reversed over the next year or two.