Ah yes, blame the victims, that’s sure to solve the problem. I suppose I should also blame the people who live in the building that was dropped for boarding with a terrorist? I mean they can just choose to be somewhere else, right?

Fuck off.

So many people talking about the fact that this leaked, and not enough are talking about what leaked.

We have political leaders throwing up fire emoji’s over dropping a building on a terrorist, with no regard for the, what, dozens? of innocent lives that were lost in the crossfire.

If you have to kill someone, sure, that’s a moral position we can discuss. No one should ever be celebrating it, particularly when others died in the process. But hey, they’re not Americans, so they don’t count.

Amazing.

“Let them eat ca-”

Wait.

I promise you, they would take America with them. Willingly, out of spite, if nothing else.

Wait, this was ACTUALLY a quote from a famous dictator? I thought I was just being snarky and connecting this comment to the kind of rhetoric famously used by dictators. I didn’t realize this is specific rhetoric used by a specific dictator.

You don’t even need to read between the lines anymore. Insane.

Trump defended the order, stating, “He who saves his Country does not violate any Law.”

Okay, Adolf.

Racism is the result of systems which disadvantage people of a given ethnic group. These people by definition cannot be victims of racism, because they come from the advantaged social group.

They are victims of prejudice. Prejudice born of the fact that they are the benefactors of a long history of racism in South Africa. While I am sure not all of them are deserving of this prejudice, I suspect the ones calling it racism are.

I’m with him. Deleting the entire Department of Government Efficiency would solve a lot of problems.

Does this mean the algorithm was designed to push a republican agenda? Or does the algorithm know that liberals are more likely to watch videos from the opposing side than conservatives?

Both of these things can be true.

A friend of mine likes to say, a systems goal is what it does in practice, not its design intent.

All allegations that the 2024 election was rigged are speculative, and there are no investigations examining the claims. The claims have not contested the election results as a whole.

Okay? Then fuck off with your clickbait fearmongering bullshit? Either there is evidence of ratfuckery, and investigations should already be underway, or there’s not and they don’t need to be.

Trump is literally building camps for out groups and disassembling the entire trade system that the US and its closest allies have depended on. We don’t have time for this speculative “maybe” garbage. Get out there and do something, or stop wasting my time with speculation in the hopes that punchy headlines and ad engagement will save you for Der Fuhrer’s concentration camps and total economic collapse.

I’m fucking so tired of reading the words “a gesture.” We know what the fuck it is, and you do too you fucking cowards.

Your best bet is to be in a lot of instances. My experiences so far is that basically any singular instance has its bias’, and while some unapologetically ban users for disagreeing with them, the ones that don’t still down vote for disagreeing with them.

While one of these forms of censorship is worse than the other, it’s all censorship, and the only way to see a variety of views is to stay in the varying instances.

Children should not be guilty of the sins of their parents

Convinient position to take when you’re the benefactor of apartheid.

Good thing I wasn’t the one claiming the “whole world” believes anything.

Saving this one for the next time I’m hit with the “the whole world thinks we’re a joke with [democrat] in charge. This is why Trump is great. The world respects us with him leading.”

He stumbled across it once and everyone reacted positively. He has now realized it illicits a positive responsevand uses it every time he opens his mouth, with no understanding of what it means.

There’s a very on-the-nose comparison here to severe mental disabilities, but that feels incredibly rude to people with genuine needs.

What if I told you there’s room to do the things you deem masculine, things you deem feminine, and still identify as yourself? People like Zuckerburg speaking like he has everything figured out when he can’t even deconstruct a false dichotomy is some peak pseudo-intellectualism.