Precisely.

You can’t argue logic with the illogical, morals with the amoral, or shame with the shameless

Cool, thanks. I’m busy washing my hair today

Sure, but “retaliatory strikes” would probably be a more accurate descriptor. “Attack” often carries the implication of a first strike

State department: “no.”

SCOTUS: “Oh, okay then.”

Did she say thank you?!

Nuclear weapons didn’t prevent Ukraine

They sure at shit would have.

Putin only invaded because Ukraine voluntarily disarmed after promises of protection from the US.