return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 month agoSupreme Court blocks, for now, new deportations under 18th century wartime lawapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up185arrow-down10
arrow-up185arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court blocks, for now, new deportations under 18th century wartime lawapnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squareAdamEatsAss@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·1 month ago“Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented.” Even Trump’s appointees are going against him here.
minus-squareplz1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoI had to re-read that a few times for it to click.
minus-squareJoe Breuer@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 month agoThis article says that Clarence and Alito dissented from the majority opinion (which I assume to be “no deportation without due process”). This thread reads differently to me… ELI5 please?
minus-squareCort@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agoRepublicans, Thomas and alito (and Roberts) aren’t trump appointees. Trump appointees are gorsuch, Barrett, and boof kavanaugh. They all signed the majority opinion against Trump
“Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented.”
Even Trump’s appointees are going against him here.
I had to re-read that a few times for it to click.
This article says that Clarence and Alito dissented from the majority opinion (which I assume to be “no deportation without due process”).
This thread reads differently to me… ELI5 please?
Republicans, Thomas and alito (and Roberts) aren’t trump appointees.
Trump appointees are gorsuch, Barrett, and boof kavanaugh. They all signed the majority opinion against Trump